考虑“字符串”(将其视为数字数组)

0 0 1 8 8 8 1 0

rle(“ groupby”)是:

[(0,2), (1, 1), (8,3), (1, 1), (0, 1)]

然后,我们用上一个元素的运行长度的总和来丰富上述RLE。

因此,以上的丰富版本变为:

[(0, (0,2)), (0+2, (1, 1)), (0+2+1, (8,3)), (0+1+2+3, (1, 1)), (0+1+2+3+1, (0, 1))]

“字符串”在1:

0 0 , 8 8 8 , 0

RLE分裂1

[(0,2)] , [(8,3)] , [(0, 1)]

“字符串”在8:

0 0 1 , , , 1 0

RLE分裂8

[(0,2), (1, 1)] , , , [(1, 1), (0, 1)]

注意:在我的示例中,我引用了“ Z上的rle拆分”列表,而无需丰富它们。不是这样。我把它们抛在外,以减少混乱。例如,“ RLE在1”上应真正将其视为:

[(0, (0,2))] , [(0+2+1, (8,3))] , [(0+1+2+3+1, (0, 1)]

我该如何在Z上实现此“ rle拆分” (= 1,8;在这种情况下)

很好地排除空阵列(分开后)。

也许是一个聪明的列表。 (似乎更容易用for循环求解,并嵌套嵌套)

有帮助吗?

解决方案

只是为了展示方式,我强烈建议您不要使用

“优雅”丑陋的方式:

>>> data
[0, 0, 1, 8, 8, 8, 4, 4, 1, 0]
>>> def fromDataToSplitRLE(dat,n):
    RLE=[(k,len(tuple(g))) for k,g in itertools.groupby(dat)]
    tmp=tuple(zip(*RLE))
    return [list(g) for k,g in itertools.groupby((zip((sum(tmp[1][:i]) for i in range(len(tmp[1]))) ,(zip(*tmp)))),lambda x:x[1][0]!=n) if k]

>>> fromDataToSplitRLE(data,1)
[[(0, (0, 2))], [(3, (8, 3)), (6, (4, 2))], [(9, (0, 1))]]

其他提示

import itertools

def get_rle(list_of_digits, split_on=None):
    count = 0
    rle = []
    active_group = []
    rle_app = rle.append
    for item, group in itertools.groupby(list_of_digits):
        L = len(list(group))
        if item == split_on:
            rle_app(active_group)
            active_group = []
        else:
            active_group.append((count, (item, L)))
        count += L

    rle_app(active_group)
    return rle

list_of_digits = map(int, '0 0 1 8 8 8 1 0'.split())
print get_rle(list_of_digits)
print get_rle(list_of_digits, 8)
print get_rle(list_of_digits, 1)

aaron@aaron-laptop:~/code/tmp$ python rle.py
[[(0, (0, 2)), (2, (1, 1)), (3, (8, 3)), (6, (1, 1)), (7, (0, 1))]]
[[(0, (0, 2)), (2, (1, 1))], [(6, (1, 1)), (7, (0, 1))]]
[[(0, (0, 2))], [(3, (8, 3))], [(7, (0, 1))]]
许可以下: CC-BY-SA归因
不隶属于 StackOverflow
scroll top