Question

Ce serait-il un bon choix pour une utilisation dans un service WCF écrit en C #?J'utilise actuellement FireBirdSQL, mais cela me donne trop de problèmes.La documentation et le soutien sont également horribles.

Edit: Désolé, j'aurais dû être plus précis lors de la question.Ce que je voulais dire était de savoir si SQLite est un bon choix pour une base de données intégrée au sein de C #.MS SQL est hors de question pour celui-ci.

Était-ce utile?

La solution

SQLite is a great platform for any language, however there are small concerns I've had with it under .NET.

  1. It is natively compiled. This breaks .NET's AnyCPU Implementations of .NET (i.e. you have to explicitly distribute a 32bit & 64bit version of your app, and have some hand-written rules in your .csproj (MSBUILD) file to select the different dependencies based on what you select.
  2. It has some sticky threading issues. You're going to run into trouble if you're trying to use the same DB from multiple places (multiple instances of your app) etc. It's doable, but it basically uses a simplistic form of database/table locking to achieve this, which could be a major concern based on your program.

All In all i really like SQLite, but if I could find one that didn't require a redistributable (*cough*SQL Express*cough*), I would use another embedded DBMS for .NET Apps. To date I havent found one aside from Raven DB but that's a document DB.

Edit: Note, Raven DB Is also only free for open-source applications. It's not suitable for proprietary applications unless you're willing to shell out for a licence, so when looking into it please be sure to factor it into your budget.

Autres conseils

SQL Express always works well

Licencié sous: CC-BY-SA avec attribution
Non affilié à StackOverflow
scroll top