سؤال

Two ways to make a clickable button:

Method 1:

<img src="image.png" alt="" id="btn_img" />

Method 2:

<a id="btn_img"><img src="image.png" alt="" /></a>

Apart from CSS rendering difference (e.g. the cursor, the blue image border produced by IE), if I assign a click event to the id btn_img, is there any behavioral difference, e.g. cross-browser compatibility? and the most important question, which method is preferred?

The code to add event:

$('#btn_img').click(function() {
  alert('do something');
});

hope this question won't fall into "opinion-based" category.

هل كانت مفيدة؟

المحلول

Both results are the same. The only difference is that the click event is triggered in the image in the first method and in the link tag in second method. So we need to prevent the default behavior of the a tag but not the img tag. Anyway, in regards to styling purposes, wrapping the img tag with any element would be better than that not wrapping it, so it's better practice to use the second method.

مرخصة بموجب: CC-BY-SA مع الإسناد
لا تنتمي إلى StackOverflow
scroll top