to convert a byte array from another machine which is big-endian, we can use:

long long convert(unsigned char data[]) {
  long long res;
  res = 0;
  for( int i=0;i < DATA_SIZE; ++i)
    res = (res << 8) + data[i];
  return res;
}

if another machine is little-endian, we can use

long long convert(unsigned char data[]) {
  long long res;
  res = 0;
  for( int i=DATA_SIZE-1;i >=0 ; --i)
    res = (res << 8) + data[i];
  return res;
}

why do we need the above functions? shouldn't we use hton at sender and ntoh when receiving? Is it because hton/nton is to convert integer while this convert() is for char array?

有帮助吗?

解决方案

The hton/ntoh functions convert between network order and host order. If these two are the same (i.e., on big-endian machines) these functions do nothing. So they cannot be portably relied upon to swap endianness. Also, as you pointed out, they are only defined for 16-bit (htons) and 32-bit (htonl) integers; your code can handle up to the sizeof(long long) depending on how DATA_SIZE is set.

其他提示

Through the network you always receive a series of bytes (octets), which you can't directly pass to ntohs or ntohl. Supposing the incoming bytes are buffered in the (unsigned) char array buf, you could do short x = ntohs(*(short *)(buf+offset)); but this is not portable unless buf+offset is always even, so that you read with correct alignment. Similarly, to do long y = ntohl(*(long *)(buf+offset)); you have to make sure that 4 divides buf+offset. Your convert() functions, though, don't have this limitation, they can process byte series at arbitrary (unaligned) memory address.

许可以下: CC-BY-SA归因
不隶属于 StackOverflow
scroll top