是否可以使用带有Rails的RSpec测试给定布局的使用,例如我想要一个执行以下操作的匹配器:

response.should use_layout('my_layout_name')

我在谷歌搜索时发现了一个use_layout匹配器,但它不起作用,因为响应或控制器似乎都没有匹配器正在寻找的布局属性。

有帮助吗?

解决方案

我找到了如何编写 use_layout <的示例/ code> matcher 就是这样做的。以下是链接消失的代码:

# in spec_helper.rb

class UseLayout
   def initialize(expected)
     @expected = 'layouts/' + expected
   end
   def matches?(controller)
     @actual = controller.layout
     #@actual.equal?(@expected)
     @actual == @expected
   end
   def failure_message
     return "use_layout expected #{@expected.inspect}, got # 
{@actual.inspect}", @expected, @actual
   end
   def negeative_failure_message
     return "use_layout expected #{@expected.inspect} not to equal # 
{@actual.inspect}", @expected, @actual
   end
end


def use_layout(expected)
   UseLayout.new(expected)
end

# in controller spec
   response.should use_layout("application")

其他提示

David Chelimsky在 Ruby论坛上发布了一个很好的答案:

response.should render_template("layouts/some_layout")

这适用于我在Rails上使用边缘Rails和边缘RSpec:

response.layout.should == 'layouts/application'

不应该把它变成适合你的匹配器。

已经有一个功能完善的匹配器:

response.should render_template(:layout => 'fooo')

(Rspec 2.6.4)

我必须编写以下内容才能完成这项工作:

response.should render_template("layouts/some_folder/some_layout", "template-name")

这是匹配器的更新版本。我已经更新它以符合最新版本的RSpec。我添加了相关的只读属性并删除了旧的返回格式。

# in spec_helper.rb

class UseLayout
  attr_reader :expected
  attr_reader :actual

  def initialize(expected)
    @expected = 'layouts/' + expected
  end

  def matches?(controller)
    if controller.is_a?(ActionController::Base)
      @actual = 'layouts/' + controller.class.read_inheritable_attribute(:layout)
    else
      @actual = controller.layout
    end
    @actual ||= "layouts/application"
    @actual == @expected
  end

  def description
    "Determines if a controller uses a layout"
  end

  def failure_message
    return "use_layout expected #{@expected.inspect}, got #{@actual.inspect}"
  end

 def negeative_failure_message
   return "use_layout expected #{@expected.inspect} not to equal #{@actual.inspect}"
  end
end

def use_layout(expected)
  UseLayout.new(expected)
end

此外,匹配器现在也可以使用在控制器类级别指定的布局,可以按如下方式使用:

class PostsController < ApplicationController
  layout "posts"
end

在控制器规范中,您只需使用:

it { should use_layout("posts") }

这是我最终选择的解决方案。它用于rpsec 2和rails 3.
我刚刚在spec / support目录中添加了这个文件。 链接是: https://gist.github.com/971342     

# spec/support/matchers/render_layout.rb

ActionView::Base.class_eval do unless instance_methods.include?('_render_layout_with_tracking') def _render_layout_with_tracking(layout, locals, &block) controller.instance_variable_set(:@_rendered_layout, layout) _render_layout_without_tracking(layout, locals, &block) end alias_method_chain :_render_layout, :tracking end end

# You can use this matcher anywhere that you have access to the controller instance, # like in controller or integration specs. # # == Example Usage # # Expects no layout to be rendered: # controller.should_not render_layout # Expects any layout to be rendered: # controller.should render_layout # Expects app/views/layouts/application.html.erb to be rendered: # controller.should render_layout('application') # Expects app/views/layouts/application.html.erb not to be rendered: # controller.should_not render_layout('application') # Expects app/views/layouts/mobile/application.html.erb to be rendered: # controller.should_not render_layout('mobile/application') RSpec::Matchers.define :render_layout do |*args| expected = args.first match do |c| actual = get_layout(c) if expected.nil? !actual.nil? # actual must be nil for the test to pass. Usage: should_not render_layout elsif actual actual == expected.to_s else false end end

failure_message_for_should do |c| actual = get_layout(c) if actual.nil? && expected.nil? "expected a layout to be rendered but none was" elsif actual.nil? "expected layout #{expected.inspect} but no layout was rendered" else "expected layout #{expected.inspect} but #{actual.inspect} was rendered" end end

failure_message_for_should_not do |c| actual = get_layout(c) if expected.nil? "expected no layout but #{actual.inspect} was rendered" else "expected #{expected.inspect} not to be rendered but it was" end end

def get_layout(controller) if template = controller.instance_variable_get(:@_rendered_layout) template.virtual_path.sub(/layouts\//, '') end end end

<代码> response.should render_template(&quot; layouts / some_folder / some_layout&quot;) response.should render_template(&quot; template-name&quot;)

controller.active_layout.name 适合我。

这是dmcnally代码的一个版本,它不允许传递参数,使得“should use_layout”和“should_not use_layout” work(断言控制器分别使用任何布局,或者没有布局 - 我希望只有第二个是有用的,因为如果它使用布局你应该更具体):

class UseLayout
   def initialize(expected = nil)
     if expected.nil?
       @expected = nil
     else
       @expected = 'layouts/' + expected
     end
   end
   def matches?(controller)
     @actual = controller.layout
     #@actual.equal?(@expected)
     if @expected.nil?
       @actual
     else
       @actual == @expected
     end
   end
   def failure_message
     if @expected.nil?
       return 'use_layout expected a layout to be used, but none was', 'any', @actual
     else
       return "use_layout expected #{@expected.inspect}, got #{@actual.inspect}", @expected, @actual
     end
   end
   def negative_failure_message
     if @expected.nil?
       return "use_layout expected no layout to be used, but #{@actual.inspect} found", 'any', @actual
     else
       return "use_layout expected #{@expected.inspect} not to equal #{@actual.inspect}", @expected, @actual
     end
   end
end


def use_layout(expected = nil)
   UseLayout.new(expected)
end

Shoulda Matchers 为此方案提供了匹配器。 (文档) 这似乎有效:

       expect(response).to render_with_layout('my_layout')

它会产生适当的失败消息,如:

预计使用“calendar_layout”进行渲染布局,但使用“应用程序”,“应用程序”

进行渲染

使用 rails 4.2 rspec 3.3 shoulda-matchers 2.8.0进行测试

编辑:shoulda-matchers提供此方法。早该::匹配器::的ActionController :: RenderWithLayoutMatcher

许可以下: CC-BY-SA归因
不隶属于 StackOverflow
scroll top