我有一个类从 BlockingQueue 获取对象,并通过在连续循环中调用 take()来处理它们。在某些时候,我知道不会有更多的对象被添加到队列中。如何中断 take()方法以阻止阻塞?

这是处理对象的类:

public class MyObjHandler implements Runnable {

  private final BlockingQueue<MyObj> queue;

  public class MyObjHandler(BlockingQueue queue) {
    this.queue = queue;
  }

  public void run() {
    try {
      while (true) {
        MyObj obj = queue.take();
        // process obj here
        // ...
      }
    } catch (InterruptedException e) {
      Thread.currentThread().interrupt();
    }
  }
}

这是使用此类处理对象的方法:

public void testHandler() {

  BlockingQueue<MyObj> queue = new ArrayBlockingQueue<MyObj>(100);  

  MyObjectHandler  handler = new MyObjectHandler(queue);
  new Thread(handler).start();

  // get objects for handler to process
  for (Iterator<MyObj> i = getMyObjIterator(); i.hasNext(); ) {
    queue.put(i.next());
  }

  // what code should go here to tell the handler
  // to stop waiting for more objects?
}
有帮助吗?

解决方案

如果不打算中断线程,则另一个是放置“标记”。或“命令”队列中的对象,MyObjHandler会将其识别出来,然后突破循环。

其他提示

BlockingQueue<MyObj> queue = new ArrayBlockingQueue<MyObj>(100);
MyObjectHandler handler = new MyObjectHandler(queue);
Thread thread = new Thread(handler);
thread.start();
for (Iterator<MyObj> i = getMyObjIterator(); i.hasNext(); ) {
  queue.put(i.next());
}
thread.interrupt();

但是,如果执行此操作,则当队列中仍有项目等待处理时,线程可能会被中断。您可能需要考虑使用 poll 而不是 take ,这将允许处理线程超时并在等待一段时间后终止没有新的输入。

很晚但希望这对其他人也有帮助我遇到了类似的问题,并使用 poll 方法/ questions / 812342 / how-to-interrupt-a-blockingqueue-which-blocking-on-take / 812354#812354“> erickson 以及一些细微的变化,

class MyObjHandler implements Runnable 
{
    private final BlockingQueue<MyObj> queue;
    public volatile boolean Finished;  //VOLATILE GUARANTEES UPDATED VALUE VISIBLE TO ALL
    public MyObjHandler(BlockingQueue queue) 
    {
        this.queue = queue;
        Finished = false;
    }
    @Override
    public void run() 
    {        
        while (true) 
        {
            try 
            {
                MyObj obj = queue.poll(100, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
                if(obj!= null)//Checking if job is to be processed then processing it first and then checking for return
                {
                    // process obj here
                    // ...
                }
                if(Finished && queue.isEmpty())
                    return;

            } 
            catch (InterruptedException e) 
            {                   
                return;
            }
        }
    }
}

public void testHandler() 
{
    BlockingQueue<MyObj> queue = new ArrayBlockingQueue<MyObj>(100); 

    MyObjHandler  handler = new MyObjHandler(queue);
    new Thread(handler).start();

    // get objects for handler to process
    for (Iterator<MyObj> i = getMyObjIterator(); i.hasNext(); )
    {
        queue.put(i.next());
    }

    // what code should go here to tell the handler to stop waiting for more objects?
    handler.Finished = true; //THIS TELLS HIM
    //If you need you can wait for the termination otherwise remove join
    myThread.join();
}

这解决了两个问题

  1. 标记 BlockingQueue ,以便它知道它不必等待更多元素
  2. 两者之间没有中断,只有当处理队列中的所有项目并且没有剩余项目需要添加时,处理块才会终止

中断线程:

thread.interrupt()

或者不要打断它的讨厌。

    public class MyQueue<T> extends ArrayBlockingQueue<T> {

        private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
        private boolean done = false;

        public ParserQueue(int capacity) {  super(capacity); }

        public void done() { done = true; }

        public boolean isDone() { return done; }

        /**
         * May return null if producer ends the production after consumer 
         * has entered the element-await state.
         */
        public T take() throws InterruptedException {
            T el;
            while ((el = super.poll()) == null && !done) {
                synchronized (this) {
                    wait();
                }
            }

            return el;
        }
    }
  1. 当生产者将对象放入队列时,调用 queue.notify(),如果结束,则调用 queue.done()
  2. 循环while(!queue.isDone()||!queue.isEmpty())
  3. test take()返回null
  4. 的值
许可以下: CC-BY-SA归因
不隶属于 StackOverflow
scroll top