According to this precedence table, the comma operator is left-associative. That is, a, b, c is parsed as (a, b), c. Is that a necessity? Wouldn't a, (b, c) have the exact same behavior?

有帮助吗?

解决方案

Since overloadable operator, exists, no, it's not the same behavior. a, (b, c) could call different overloads than (a, b), c.

其他提示

The comma operator has left-to-right associativity. Two expressions separated by a comma are evaluated left to right. The left operand is always evaluated, and all side effects are completed before the right operand is evaluated.

Commas can be used as separators in some contexts, such as function argument lists. Do not confuse the use of the comma as a separator with its use as an operator; the two uses are completely different.

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/zs06xbxh.aspx

许可以下: CC-BY-SA归因
不隶属于 StackOverflow
scroll top