I see a lot of code like:

var myApp ={};
(function() {
    console.log("Hello");
    this.var1 = "mark";     //"this" is global, because it runs immediately on load.  Caller is global
    myApp.sayGoodbye = function() {
        console.log("Goodbye");
    };
})();

Which causes the anonymous function to execute immediately. But what is the advantage of this, compared to just putting the code inline?

var myApp ={};
console.log("Hello");
var1 = "mark";     
myApp.sayGoodbye = function() {
    console.log("Goodbye");
};

Apparently it's to do with scope of the function, but as the function is anonymous and called by window, it's scope (i.e. this) is global, no?

有帮助吗?

解决方案

Usually, you would have this :

        var myApp ={};
        (function() {
            console.log("Hello");
            var var1 = "mark";  
            myApp.sayGoodbye = function() {
                console.log("Goodbye");
            };
        })();

The main difference is that var1 doesn't clutter the global namespace. After this call, var1 is still the same than before (generally undefined).

As var1 can only be accessed from the function defineds in the closure, it is said "private".

Apart avoiding possible causes of conflicts, it's just cleaner not to keep global variables when useless.

Here, you don't have a local variable but a global one defined as this.var1. It's probably a bug, or the reason would be found elsewhere in the code.

其他提示

One reason: wrapping your code in an anonymous function allows you to create a module which distinguishes a public API from private functions and variables that are only used internally to the module. This avoids polluting the global namespace.

var myApp ={};
(function() {
    console.log("Hello");
    this.var1 = "mark";

    function helper() {/*Some code here*/;}

    myApp.sayGoodbye = function() {
        helper()
        console.log("Goodbye");
    };
})();

I could say:

var myApp ={};
console.log("Hello");
var var1 = "mark";

function helper() {/*Some code here*/;}

myApp.sayGoodbye = function() {
    helper()
    console.log("Goodbye");
};

But then the global scope includes a function called helper which is of no use to anyone using your module, and could lead to possible naming conflicts with other modules.

I could alternatively just include helper as a method of myApp.

var myApp ={};
console.log("Hello");
var var1 = "mark";

myApp.helper = function() {/*Some code here*/;}

myApp.sayGoodbye = function() {
    this.helper()
    console.log("Goodbye");
};

However, I may wish to prevent users from directly calling helper, in which case this won't do.

许可以下: CC-BY-SA归因
不隶属于 StackOverflow
scroll top