Yes. Why wouldn't it be?
题
I've gone through the documentation and can't find a definitive answer to my query.
In a lot of my tests, the execution of a SKIP
block is conditional to the success of a prior test.
So, for example, this what I write:
ok( @results > $threshold , 'Threshold met' );
SKIP: {
skip 'due to insufficient results', 3
unless @results > $threshold;
# ...
}
If my test changes, I don't want to have to change two locations, so I'd like a DRY-er equivalent:
SKIP: {
skip 'due to insufficient results', 3
unless ok( @results > $threshold , 'Threshold met' );
# ...
}
My initial tests suggest that the two snippets are equivalent.
However, something in the documentation caught my eye:
Each
SKIP
block must have the labelSKIP
, orTest::More
can't work its magic.
My concern here is that the magic may spill over to the ok()
as it is now inside the block.
解决方案
Yes. Why wouldn't it be?