In Java, I need an object which is an ArrayList of 60 LinkedBlockingQueues. The ArrayList will .add() 60 LinkedBlockingQueues in the beginning of the program, while still single threaded. Then one thread will .add() to the LinkedBlockingQueues while another thread will .poll(). Is there any need to explicitly synchronize this object?

有帮助吗?

解决方案

Nope, if the list isn't modified after initialization then you don't need to synchronize it. I recommend you use an UnmodifiableList instead of an ArrayList - you'll get a runtime exception if anybody tries to modify the list after it's initialized, which is preferable to having a race condition.

其他提示

Is there any need to explicitly synchronize this object?

If you fork the threads after you finish building the List then you are fine. However, I'd use an array instead of a Collection if it is truly immutable. You can just do:

BlockingQueue[] blockingQueueArray =
   blockingQueueList.toArray(new BlockingQueue[blockingQueueList.size()]);
许可以下: CC-BY-SA归因
不隶属于 StackOverflow
scroll top