PostgreSQL 9.1: vacuumdb vs. autovacuum
-
02-11-2019 - |
Frage
Have a question on the difference between just allowing autovacuum to take care of vacuum'ing or having to run a full db vacuum in a certain interval (every night?, every week?).
We used to run a full vacuumdb every night before a full backup. It used to take around an hour and a half. Then we stopped and just allowed autovacuum to do it's thing.
Is that a good idea? Should there still be a vacuumdb run every night, week?
I noticed some processes tonight...
"autovacuum: VACUUM public.large_table (to prevent wraparound)"
Is that normal or is that because we stopped running a full vacuumdb every night?
Thanks all for any insight.
Keine korrekte Lösung
Lizenziert unter: CC-BY-SA mit Zuschreibung
Nicht verbunden mit dba.stackexchange