Frage

Ich habe das GEPY-Paket benutzt, das ein tolles Job tut, jedoch einige der Ergebnisse, die ich bekomme, uneinheitlich oder mit einer relativ großen Verschiebung, ich vermute, dass das Problem mit meiner Lagerberechnung hinweist: generasacodicetagpre.

Ich muss das Lager berechnen, S.T.Center_X und Center_Y sind der Drehpunkt.Anschließend verwende ich GEPOPE, um den Ingenieur die GPS-Koordinate umzukehren: generasacodicetagpre.

Kann mich jemand auf das zeigen, was könnte ich falsch machen?

War es hilfreich?

Lösung

Can anyone point me to what might i be doing wrong?

  1. Not showing an example of your "inconsistant or come with a relatively large displacement" results nor your expected results; consequently answerers must rely on guesswork.

  2. Not saying what units your input (x, y, etc) is measured in, and how you get the dist used in the destination calculation. I'm assuming (in calculating bearing2 below) that positive x is easting in miles and positive y is northing in miles. It would help greatly if you were to edit your question to fix (1) and (2).

  3. A coding style that's not very conducive to making folk want to read it ... have a look through this.

  4. In school trigonometry, angles are measured anticlockwise from the X axis (East). In navigation, bearings are measured clockwise from the Y axis (North). See code below. For an example of bearing in use, follow this link, scroll down to the "Destination point given distance and bearing from start point" section, notice that the example is talking about bearings of about 96 or 97 degrees, then click on "view map" and you will notice that the heading is slightly south of east (east being 90 degrees).

Code:

from math import degrees, atan2
    def gb(x, y, center_x, center_y):
        angle = degrees(atan2(y - center_y, x - center_x))
        bearing1 = (angle + 360) % 360
        bearing2 = (90 - angle) % 360
        print "gb: x=%2d y=%2d angle=%6.1f bearing1=%5.1f bearing2=%5.1f" % (x, y, angle, bearing1, bearing2)

    for pt in ((0, 1),(1,1),(1,0),(1,-1),(0,-1),(-1,-1),(-1, 0),(-1,1)):
        gb(pt[0], pt[1], 0, 0)

Output:

gb: x= 0 y= 1 angle=  90.0 bearing1= 90.0 bearing2=  0.0
gb: x= 1 y= 1 angle=  45.0 bearing1= 45.0 bearing2= 45.0
gb: x= 1 y= 0 angle=   0.0 bearing1=  0.0 bearing2= 90.0
gb: x= 1 y=-1 angle= -45.0 bearing1=315.0 bearing2=135.0
gb: x= 0 y=-1 angle= -90.0 bearing1=270.0 bearing2=180.0
gb: x=-1 y=-1 angle=-135.0 bearing1=225.0 bearing2=225.0
gb: x=-1 y= 0 angle= 180.0 bearing1=180.0 bearing2=270.0
gb: x=-1 y= 1 angle= 135.0 bearing1=135.0 bearing2=315.0

Andere Tipps

I'm not quite sure what you're trying to do in your code,but I do see some oddities that may need to be cleaned up.

  1. You test for dy<=0 after you test for dy>=0 in the conditional before. What should your code do if dy==0 and dx==0.
  2. Your test ((dy>=0)and((dx>0)or(dx<0))) is equivalent to (dy>=0 and dx!=0), is this what you intended?
  3. You are basically doing the same thing in all of your conditionals. Couldn't return math.degrees(math.atan2(dy,dx))+360)%360 work in every scenario? In that case, you wouldn't need to use your if statements anyway.
Lizenziert unter: CC-BY-SA mit Zuschreibung
Nicht verbunden mit StackOverflow
scroll top