Frage

Why do both of these expressions give the same result?

> (macroexpand-all '(->> "string" (.charAt)))

(. "string" charAt)

> (macroexpand-all '(-> "string" (.charAt)))

(. "string" charAt)

Isn't "->>" macro supposed to insert "string" as the last element in the list?

War es hilfreich?

Lösung

It expands first to (.charAt "string"), which indeed is last. Then that form further expands to (. "string" charAt).

Lizenziert unter: CC-BY-SA mit Zuschreibung
Nicht verbunden mit StackOverflow
scroll top