Frage

This is just for curiosity

Why does this code work:

Html.TextBoxFor(x => x.Age, new { @Value = "0"})

and this doesn't:

Html.TextBoxFor(x => x.Age, new { @value = "0"})

Note the uppercase 'V' in @Value

I know value is a keyword, but so is readonly and it works. It's not necessary to use @Readonly (with uppercase 'R').

Does anybody have a clue?

War es hilfreich?

Lösung 2

I'm not 100% sure but, that could be value is a keyword in properties, readonly isn't. Look at properties from MSDN.

enter image description here

enter image description here

Andere Tipps

InputExtensions.TextBoxFor special cases cases a few attribute names, among them value(case sensitive). This is unrelated to C# keywords.

In particular the value obtained from the expression parameter takes precedence of a property called value you pass into the htmlAttributes parameter.

Taking a look at your example:

  • If you use Html.TextBoxFor(x => x.Age, new { @value = "0"}) it will compile, but TextBoxFor will override the value attribute with the value x.Age evaluates to.

  • If you use Html.TextBoxFor(x => x.Age, new { @Value = "0"}) it will compile, and you will get two entries in the attribute dictionary, one Value that's "0", and one value, that's x.Age.

    I expect the output to be something nonsensical like <input Value="0" value="..." type="text"/>.

My guess is that the MVC code is hard coded to look for Value because a MS engineer intended you to always use PascalCase property names, since that's their typical convention and PascalCase avoids conflicts with non-contextual keywords such as class. Notice how PascalCase properties get rendered in the HTML as lowercase.

The reason is not about value being a keyword, since it's a contextual keyword in C# and only has special meaning (and thus turns blue in the IDE) in property getters and setters. It has no special meaning in the anonymous type passed to TextBoxFor.

Lizenziert unter: CC-BY-SA mit Zuschreibung
Nicht verbunden mit StackOverflow
scroll top