Frage

I have the following spec

BidirectionalGraph Fixture = new BidirectionalGraph();

public void VerticesShouldBeAbleToAssociateMultipleEdges()
{
    int a = 0;
    int b = 1;
    int c = 2;

    Fixture.AddEdge(a, b);
    Fixture.AddEdge(b, c);
    Fixture.AddEdge(c, a);

    Fixture.EdgesFrom(a).Should().BeEquivalentTo
        ( new []{a, b} 
        , new []{a, c});
}

where EdgesFrom is defined so

public IEnumerable<int[]> EdgesFrom(int vertex)

however my test fails with

Result Message: Expected collection 

    {{0, 1}, {0, 2}} to be equivalent to 
    {{0, 1}, {0, 2}}.

Which doesn't quite makes sense to me as they are obviously equivalent. Does FluentAssertions just not work when comparing collections of collections?

War es hilfreich?

Lösung

That's because collection.Should().BeEquivalentTo() uses the default Equals() implementation of your type to make sure each item in the first collection appears somewhere in the 2nd collection. What you really need is new equivalency feature that I introduced in Fluent Assertions 2.0. Unfortunately I only recently became aware of confusing syntax (collection.Should().BeEquivalentTo() versus ShouldAllBeEquivalentTo()).

Lizenziert unter: CC-BY-SA mit Zuschreibung
Nicht verbunden mit StackOverflow
scroll top