Frage

I'm using Reactive extensions in my WPF application. And while using it I'm getting below ambiguous reference error.

The type 'System.IObservable<T>' exists in both 'mscorlib.dll' and 'System.Reactive.dll'

I tried with fully qualified name also and tried this url as well, but didn't get any luck. I'm using .NET 4.0 version of Reactive Extensions.

My Code:

using System; // mscorlib.dll
using Rx = System.Reactive;

public Rx.IObservable<int> BytesReceived { get { return _bytesReceivedSubj; } } // Not valid as IObservable is in System namespace of System.Reactive.

public IObservable<int> BytesReceived { get { return _bytesReceivedSubj; } } // With this I'm getting ambiguous reference error

enter image description here

Any idea how can i resolve this?

Thanks

War es hilfreich?

Lösung 2

When you reference IObservable, either use

System.Reactive.IObservable<T>

or

System.IObservable<T>

UPDATE>>>

Ahhhh, now that you've added the image, I see your problem. You have two System.IObservable classes... what idiots those Reactive guys are!

Anyway, take a look at these posts:

How to access a type with same fully qualified name in 2 different DLLs

Extern alias walkthrough

It's not pretty, but it should help you.

Andere Tipps

When you say you are using the .Net 4 version of Rx, which version of Rx are you using? 1.1 or 2.x? If using 2.x, you shouldn't have a reference to System.Reactive, but rather System.Reactive.Core. I suspect you upgraded this project from .Net 3.5 but didn't update all of your necessary references. Make sure the version of Rx you are using isn't for Silverlight 4 or .Net 3.5 (which didn't have IObservable/IObserver in the core).

It may be easiest if you just remove the references to reactive and have nuget re-add them for you using the Reactive Extensions - WPF Helpers version. Note: You may need to change your imports for classes using Rx to import System.Reactive.Linq if you are using the older version that had the extension methods in the older System.Linq namespace.

Lizenziert unter: CC-BY-SA mit Zuschreibung
Nicht verbunden mit StackOverflow
scroll top