You've uncovered a scenario that I didn't foresee. I'll fix it in release 2.2, but you can track my progress via https://github.com/dennisdoomen/fluentassertions/issues/33
FluentAssertions fails when comparing objects if one property is nullable
-
02-07-2022 - |
Question
Scenario: I have an object with a nullable property that will be updated when I run the method under test. In the expected object, I don't specify it, since I want to validate the value separately. Here is a simple test demonstration
using System;
using FluentAssertions;
using NUnit.Framework;
namespace FluentAssertionsNullableFailure
{
public class SimpleWithNullable
{
public Int64? nullableIntegerProperty
{ get; set; }
public string strProperty
{ get; set; }
}
[TestFixture]
public class Demo
{
public SimpleWithNullable actual = new SimpleWithNullable { nullableIntegerProperty = 1, strProperty = "I haz a string!" };
public SimpleWithNullable expected = new SimpleWithNullable { strProperty = "I haz a string!" };
[Test]
public void NullableTest ()
{
actual.ShouldBeEquivalentTo (
expected,
opt => opt.Using<Int64?> ( c => c.Subject.Should ().BeInRange ( 0, 10 ) ).WhenTypeIs<Int64?> ()
);
}
}
}
However, this fails with the following message:
Test Name: NullableTest
Test FullName: FluentAssertionsNullableFailure.Demo.NullableTest
Test Source: c:\Users\ebelew\Documents\Visual Studio 2012\Projects\FluentAssertionsNullableFailure\FluentAssertionsNullableFailure\Demo.cs : line 25
Test Outcome: Failed
Test Duration: 0:00:00.271
Result Message:
Expected property nullableIntegerProperty to be <null>, but found 1.
With configuration:
- Select all declared properties
- Match property by name (or throw)
- Invoke Action<Nullable`1> when info.RuntimeType.IsSameOrInherits(System.Nullable`1[System.Int64])
- Invoke Action<DateTime> when info.RuntimeType.IsSameOrInherits(System.DateTime)
- Invoke Action<String> when info.RuntimeType.IsSameOrInherits(System.String)
Result StackTrace:
at FluentAssertions.Execution.LateBoundTestFramework.Throw(String message) in d:\Workspace\Github\FluentAssertions\FluentAssertions.Net35\Execution\LateBoundTestFramework.cs:line 25
at FluentAssertions.Execution.CollectingAssertionStrategy.ThrowIfAny(IDictionary`2 context) in d:\Workspace\Github\FluentAssertions\FluentAssertions.Net35\Execution\CollectingAssertionStrategy.cs:line 57
at FluentAssertions.Execution.AssertionScope.Dispose() in d:\Workspace\Github\FluentAssertions\FluentAssertions.Net35\Execution\AssertionScope.cs:line 267
at FluentAssertions.Equivalency.EquivalencyValidator.AssertEquality(EquivalencyValidationContext context) in d:\Workspace\Github\FluentAssertions\FluentAssertions.Net35\Equivalency\EquivalencyValidator.cs:line 55
at FluentAssertions.AssertionExtensions.ShouldBeEquivalentTo[T](T subject, Object expectation, Func`2 config, String reason, Object[] reasonArgs) in d:\Workspace\Github\FluentAssertions\FluentAssertions.Net35\AssertionExtensions.cs:line 497
at FluentAssertionsNullableFailure.Demo.NullableTest() in c:\Users\ebelew\Documents\Visual Studio 2012\Projects\FluentAssertionsNullableFailure\FluentAssertionsNullableFailure\Demo.cs:line 25
How can I do this with the Options context, as opposed to splitting it into two or more assertions. (One assert for common properties, one each for item with a range or desired value instead of strict equivalence)
Note: This also fails on reference types without an explicit value in the expected
object.
Note+: I've tried ExcludingMissingProperties(), it doesn't change the error.
Solution
Licensed under: CC-BY-SA with attribution
Not affiliated with StackOverflow