Question

I was reading here, and I noticed that, for example, if I have the following function definitions:

a :: Integer->Integer->Integer
b :: Integer->Bool

The following expression is invalid:

(b . a) 2 3

It's quite strange that the functions of the composition must have only one parameter.

Is this restriction because some problem in defining the most generic one in Haskell or have some other reason?

I'm new to Haskell, so I'm asking maybe useless questions.

Was it helpful?

Solution

When you do a 2 3, you're not applying a to 2 arguments. You're actually applying a to it's only argument, resulting in a function, then take that function and apply it to 3. So you actually do 2 applications. So in a sense, what you have is not equivalent to this:

a :: (Integer, Integer) -> Integer
b :: Integer -> Integer
(b . a) (2, 3)

You could've done this, btw

(b . a 2) 3
Licensed under: CC-BY-SA with attribution
Not affiliated with StackOverflow
scroll top