Won't they conflict with each other?
No. Tracking software must be able to run inside all kinds of webpages without interfering with normal operations after all it is deployed on thousands or millions of websites (nobody would use a tracking product that might break his website and thus causes loss of revenue). So trackers can run side by side with all other kinds of scripts, including other trackers.
Do they provide consistent reports for the same tracking
They might occasionally agree on page impressions, but usually they disagree especially on aggregated values (either because they have different models e.g. as to what forms a user session or because the various script fail at different conditions or because users opted out of one tracking tool but not the other etc.)
What are the advantages of using more than one
GA works only with javascript enabled browsers, it does not track shopping carts (important e.g. if you need abandoment rates), it does not allow to collect personal information, it does not very well integrate with inventory management systems and other backoffice software, there is no way to show cancelled orders (which means that all transaction reports are necessarily wrong). There are possibly other reasons but at least for an large ecommerce outfit these are probably enough to have other software run alongside GA.
Plus you do not have access to raw data with GA, so you cannot reprocess historical data (or export data e.g. to aggregate numbers for multiple properties).
Is it worth using more than one web tracker?
If you run a large Ecommerce site or want to collect personal data, yes. For most people, no (you'll end up with multiple disagreeing reports and will spend too much time pondering which one might be correct).