I believe not.
It is not obvious from their product description, but it stands to reason, that "reserving an instance" and "long term commitment" should not be abused to have 365 instances running 1 day be as cost-effective as having the intended 1 instance for a whole year.
Using this logic you would also ask - why should I reserve more than one instance? I'll just bill all my instances on a single instance commitment - hardly a commitment, right?
Anyway, on my billing (where I have some reserved instances) I see:
USD 0.1905126763 per Linux/UNIX, m1.large instance-hour (or partial hour) (blended price)*
I believe that blended price
mean that I have more instances than I reserved, so the hourly fee is a blend between the regular hourly fee ($0.24) and the reserved instance fee ($0.084)
Update
From AWS's documentation on Blended rates (thanks @user3319714):
Linked Account 1 has purchased three Reserved Instances and has used 2,100 hours of the reservation. Due to fluctuations in application load, 60 reserved instance hours remain, which can be applied to other eligible usage in the account family. In addition, application load when all three reserved instances were already running has necessitated an additional 40 hours of on-demand usage.
From this it is obvious that running more instances that you've actually reserved will not be billed are reserved.