What happened to thread.start_new_thread in python 3
-
27-10-2019 - |
Question
I liked the ability to turn a function into a thread without the unnecessary line to define a class. I know about _thread, however it appears that you are not supposed to use _thread. Is there a good-practice equivalent of thread.start_new_thread for python 3?
Solution
threading.Thread(target=some_callable_function).start()
or if you wish to pass arguments,
threading.Thread(target=some_callable_function,
args=(tuple, of, args),
kwargs={'dict': 'of', 'keyword': 'args'},
).start()
OTHER TIPS
Unfortunately there is not a direct equivalent, because Python 3 is meant to be more portable than Python 2 and the _thread
interface is seen as too low-level for this purpose.
In Python 3 the best practice is usually to use threading.Thread(target=f...)
. This uses different semantics, but is preferred because the interface is easier to port to other Python implementations.
Licensed under: CC-BY-SA with attribution
Not affiliated with StackOverflow