Question

I am reading the section about elliptic curve cryptography in Christoffer Paares book ("Understanding Cryptography"). I decided that I would implement a function for elliptic curve point addition and point doubling in python. For my test I used the example in the book so I could test my results.

The curve used in the example is: y^2 = x^3 + 2x + 2 mod 17

The generator used is: p = (5,1)

Thus the cycle becomes:

1p = (5,1)

2p = (6,3)

3p = (10,6)

4p = (3,1)

5p = (9,16)

6p = (16,13)

7p = (0,6)

8p = (13,7)

9p = (7,6)

10p = (7,1)

11p = (13,10)

12p = (0,11)

13p = (16,4)

14p = (9,1)

15p = (3,16)

16p = (10,11)

17p = (6,14)

18p = (5,16)

19p = The neutral element (Point at infinity)

20p = (5,1)

...

I wrote this code in an attempt to reproduce the results:

def add(a,p,P,Q):
   #Check For Neutral Element
   if P == (0,0) or Q == (0,0):
       return (P[0]+Q[0],P[1]+Q[1])

   #Check For Inverses (Return Neutral Element - Point At Infinity)
   if P[0] == Q[0]:
       if (-P[1])%p == Q[1] or (-Q[1])%p == P[1]:
           return (0,0)

   #Calculate Slope
   if P != Q:
       s = (Q[1]-P[1]) / (Q[0]-P[0])
   else:
       s = ((3*(P[0]*P[0])+a)%p) ** (2*P[1])

   #Calculate Third Intersection
   x = s*s - P[0] - Q[0]
   y = (s*(P[0]-x)) - P[1]

   y = y%p
   x = x%p

   return (x,y)

r = (5,1)
for i in range(1,20):
   print i,':',r
   r = add(2,17,r,(5,1))

However the output is:

  1. : (5, 1)
  2. : (6, 3)
  3. : (10, 6)
  4. : (3, 1)
  5. : (9, 16)
  6. : (12, 9)
  7. : (1, 2)
  8. : (12, 9)
  9. : (1, 2)
  10. : (12, 9)
  11. : (1, 2)
  12. : (12, 9)
  13. : (1, 2)
  14. : (12, 9)
  15. : (1, 2)
  16. : (12, 9)
  17. : (1, 2)
  18. : (12, 9)
  19. : (1, 2)

As you might see it follows the expected result until 6p and then enters a cycle with the length of 2. I have been staring at this for hours now and I still don't know why it doesn't work (after all: how hard can it be... it's 30 lines of python) .

Was it helpful?

Solution

I am not really aware of the topic but here is a link to a repository implementing the ECC: github

Edit: The actual problem is the division modulo p. You can't just divide using integer arithmetics (15 / 4 == 3) but need to multiply by the inverse of 4 modulo 17 instead. The inverse of 4 modulo 17 is 13, because 4 * 13 % 17 == 1. Your fraction becomes 15*13, which is the equivalent of saying »15 * 1/4 modulo 17«. Just put some debug prints around your slope computation and you will see when the inversion begins to differ from simple integer division.

def euclid(a, b):
    '''Solve x*a + y*b = ggt(a, b) and return (x, y, ggt(a, b))'''
    # Non-recursive approach hence suitable for large numbers
    x = yy = 0
    y = xx = 1
    while b:
        q = a // b
        a, b = b, a % b
        x, xx = xx - q * x, x
        y, yy = yy - q * y, y
    return xx, yy, a

def inv(a, n):
    '''Perform inversion 1/a modulo n. a and n should be COPRIME.'''
    # coprimality is not checked here in favour of performance
    i = euclid(a, n)[0]
    while i < 0:
        i += n
    return i

def add(a,p,P,Q):
   #Check For Neutral Element
   if P == (0,0) or Q == (0,0):
       return (P[0]+Q[0],P[1]+Q[1])

   #Check For Inverses (Return Neutral Element - Point At Infinity)
   if P[0] == Q[0]:
       if (-P[1])%p == Q[1] or (-Q[1])%p == P[1]:
           return (0,0)

   #Calculate Slope 
   if P != Q:

       # perform multiplication with the inverse modulo p
       s = (Q[1]-P[1]) * inv(Q[0]-P[0], p)
   else:
       s = ((3*(P[0]*P[0])+a)%p) ** (2*P[1])

   #Calculate Third Intersection
   x = s*s - P[0] - Q[0]
   y = (s*(P[0]-x)) - P[1]

   y = y%p
   x = x%p

   return (x,y)

r = (5,1)
for i in range(1,20):
   print i,':',r
   r = add(2,17,r,(5,1))

prints

1 : (5, 1)
2 : (6, 3)
3 : (10, 6)
4 : (3, 1)
5 : (9, 16)
6 : (16, 13)
7 : (0, 6)
8 : (13, 7)
9 : (7, 6)
10 : (7, 11)
11 : (13, 10)
12 : (0, 11)
13 : (16, 4)
14 : (9, 1)
15 : (3, 16)
16 : (10, 11)
17 : (6, 14)
18 : (5, 16)
19 : (0, 0)

Here a link to pypi. Feel free to use or improve it.

Licensed under: CC-BY-SA with attribution
Not affiliated with StackOverflow
scroll top