Actually this problem only occurs if you add the physics, so I think it is fair to say that the issue is caused by transferring control to box2d, not by Corona handling of the number alone. I asked on Corona forums and got this answer.
Corona Lua display object y property out by three ten-millionths of a pixel (!)
-
23-06-2023 - |
Question
When I run this code (which is based on the "DragMe" sample app) I get very unexpected results in very particular circumstances.
My "snapToGrid" function sets x and y to the nearest round 100 value after a drag.
The "examine" function outputs the x and y values after an object is created, moved or rotated (by clicking on it).
If you place an object in row 5 (so y = 500) and rotate it you will see that the y value changes to 499.99996948242 but this does not happen in any other row.
How can this be explained? I notice this does not happen if the physics bodies are not added to the display object.
I know I could call snapToGrid after rotation or round the value before I use it for anything else but I think there is an important opportunity here for me to learn something useful about Corona.
local function snapToGrid(t)
modHalf = t.x % t.width
if modHalf > t.width/2 then
t.x = t.x + (t.width-modHalf)
end
if modHalf < t.width/2 then
t.x = t.x - modHalf
end
modHalfY = t.y % t.height
if modHalfY > t.height/2 then
t.y = t.y + (t.height-modHalfY)
end
if modHalfY < t.height/2 then
t.y = t.y - modHalfY
end
display.getCurrentStage():setFocus( nil )
t.isFocus = false
return true
end
function rotatePiece(target)
if target.rotation == 270 then
target.rotation = 0
else
target.rotation = target.rotation + 90
end
end
local function dragBody(event)
local target = event.target
local phase = event.phase
local halfWidth = target.width/2
local halfHeight = target.height/2
--get tileX and tileY relative to tile centre
local tileX = event.x-target.x
local tileY = event.y-target.y
local modHalf = ""
local snap = 15
if phase == "began" then
-- Make target the top-most object
display.getCurrentStage():setFocus( target )
-- Spurious events can be sent to the target, e.g. the user presses
-- elsewhere on the screen and then moves the finger over the target.
-- To prevent this, we add this flag. Only when it's true will "move"
-- events be sent to the target.
target.isFocus = true
-- Store initial position
target.x0 = event.x - target.x
target.y0 = event.y - target.y
elseif target.isFocus then
if phase == "moved" then
-- Make object move (we subtract target.x0,target.y0 so that moves are
-- relative to initial grab point, rather than object "snapping").
target.x = event.x - target.x0
target.y = event.y - target.y0
if target.x > display.contentWidth - (target.width/2) then target.x = display.contentWidth - (target.width/2) end
if target.y > display.contentHeight - (target.height/2) then target.y = display.contentHeight - (target.height/2) end
if target.x < 0 + (target.width/2) then target.x = 0 + (target.width/2) end
if target.y < 0 + (target.height/2) then target.y = 0 + (target.height/2) end
modHalf = target.x % target.width
if modHalf < snap then
target.x = target.x - modHalf
end
if modHalf > ((target.width) - snap) then
target.x = target.x + ((target.width)-modHalf)
end
modHalfY = target.y % target.height
if modHalfY < snap then
target.y = target.y - modHalfY
end
if modHalfY > ((target.height) - snap) then
target.y = target.y + ((target.height)-modHalfY)
end
hasMoved = true
return true
elseif phase == "ended" then
if hasMoved then
hasMoved = false
snapToGrid(target)
--tile has moved
examine(target)
return true
else
--rotate piece
rotatePiece(target)
display.getCurrentStage():setFocus( nil )
target.isFocus = false
--tile has rotated
examine(target)
return true
end
end
end
-- Important to return true. This tells the system that the event
-- should not be propagated to listeners of any objects underneath.
return true
end
local onTouch = function(event)
if event.phase == "began" then
local tile = {}
img = display.newRect(event.x,event.y,100,100)
img:addEventListener( "touch", dragBody )
snapToGrid(img)
--top right corner and top middle solid
topRight = {16,-16,16,50,50,50,50,-16}
--top left and left middle solid
topLeft = {-16,-16,-16,-50,50,-50,50,-16}
--bottom right and right middle solid
bottomRight = {16,16,16,50,-50,50,-50,16}
--bottom left and bottom middle solid
bottomLeft = {-16,16,-16,-50,-50,-50,-50,16}
physics.addBody( img, "static",
{shape=topRight},
{shape=topLeft},
{shape=bottomLeft},
{shape=bottomRight}
)
--new tile created
examine(img)
return true
end
end
function examine(img)
print("--------------------------------------------------")
if img ~= nil then
print("X: "..img.x..", Y: "..img.y)
end
print("--------------------------------------------------")
end
local img
local physics = require( "physics" )
physics.setDrawMode( "hybrid" )
--draw gridlines
for i = 49, display.contentHeight, 100 do
local line = display.newLine(0,i,display.contentWidth,i)
local line2 = display.newLine(0,i+2,display.contentWidth,i+2)
end
for i = 49, display.contentWidth, 100 do
local line = display.newLine(i,0,i,display.contentHeight )
local line2 = display.newLine(i+2,0,i+2,display.contentHeight )
end
--init
physics.start()
Runtime:addEventListener("touch", onTouch)
Solution 2
OTHER TIPS
There several possibilities. Firstly, since there are no integers in Lua, all numbers are double floating point values. According to FloatingPoint on Lua wiki,
Some vendors' printf implementations may not be able to handle printing floating point numbers accurately. Believe it or not, some may incorrectly print integers (that are floating point numbers). This can manifest itself as incorrectly printing some numbers in Lua.
Indeed, try the following:
for i=1,50,0.01 do print(i) end
You will see that a lot of numbers print exactly as you would expect, by many print with an error of 10^-12 or even 2 x 10^-12.
However, your x
prints fine when you don't give it to physics module. So surely the physics module does some computation on object position and changes it. I would certainly expect that for dynamic objects (due to collision detection), but here your object seems to be "static". So it must be that physics adjusts x even for static objects. The adjustment is so small that it would not be visible on the screen (you can't perceive any motion less than a pixel), but you're right that it is interesting to ask why.
The SO post Lua: subtracting decimal numbers doesn't return correct precision is worth reading; it has some links you might find interesting and gives the neat example that decimal 0.01 cannot be represented exactly in base 2; just like 1/3 can't be represented exactly in base 10 (but it can in base 3: it would be 0.1 base 3!). The question shows that, although Lua (or possibly, the underlying C) is smart enough to print 0.01 as 0.01, it fails to print 10.08-10.07 as 0.01.
If you really want to shake your understanding of floating point values, try this:
> a=0.3
> b=0.3
> print(a==b)
true
> -- so far so good; now this:
> a=0.15 + 0.15
> b=0.1 + 0.2
> print(a,b)
0.3 0.3
> print(c==d)
false -- woa!
This is explained by the fact that 0.15 in binary has a small error which is different from that of 0.1 or 0.2, so in terms of bits they are not identical; although when printed, the difference is too small to show. You may want to read the Floating Point Guide.