Question

My C# application is using native code which is not thread safe.

I can run multiple processes of that native code, using inter-process communication to achieve concurrency.

My question is, can i use App Domains instead, so that several managed threads, each on a different App Domain, will call the native code and they will not interfere with each other?

The main goal is to prevent process seperation.

Was it helpful?

Solution 2

Yes it can be done but you should seriously measure if effort is repaid by benefits.

Windows won't load multiple copies of an unmanaged DLL and unmanaged DLLs are loaded per-process (not per AppDomain). What you can do is to create multiple temporary copies of same DLL then load them with LoadLibrary().

Each one will be loaded per-process but they'll be separated from each other (so they'll be thread-safe). All this stuff can be tied inside a class that wraps unmanaged calls (LoadLibrary, FreeLibrary, GetProcAddress and invocation itself). It'll use less resources and it'll be faster than multiple processes but you'll have to drop DllImport usage.

The only benefit I see is that this will scale much better than multiple processes (because it uses less resources) of course if you reuse instances keeping a cache (it's harder to keep a process cache than an object cache).

OTHER TIPS

No, AppDomains are a pure managed code concept. It achieves isolation by keeping the managed object roots separate. One AppDomain cannot see the objects of another, makes it very safe to abort code and unload assemblies. Never an accident, it throws away all the data that might contain state.

Unmanaged code is completely agnostic of the GC heap and thus AppDomains, it will allocate in its data section and its own native heap (HeapAlloc). Such allocations are process-global. That makes a process the isolation boundary, you'd need a helper process that loads the DLL and talk to it with one of the .NET process interop mechanisms (socket, named pipe, memory-mapped file, remoting, WCF).

Technically you could create copies of the DLL, each with a different name. But that scales very poorly and the pinvoke is very awkward since you can't use [DllImport] anymore. You need a delegate declaration for each exported function and LoadLibrary() and GetProcAddress() to initialize the delegate objects.

Licensed under: CC-BY-SA with attribution
Not affiliated with StackOverflow
scroll top