Question

I have a class

class Foo
{
   int x;
   Set<Integer> set;
}

When I build a set Set<Foo>, it compiles and runs. Comparing integers are simple, but how does Java compare two sets?

Should I override as

        if(this.toBeLocalized != that.toBeLocalized)
        {
            if(this.set.size() == that.set.size())
            {
                Set<Integer> ref = new HashSet<>();
                ref.addAll(this.set);
                ref.removeAll(that.set);
                if(ref == null)
                {
                    return 0;
                }
            }
        }
        return -1;
    }

Or there is a comparison for sets?

Was it helpful?

Solution

this is implementation of methd equals from class AbstractSet, and most of implementations of Set will extends it

  public boolean equals(Object o) {
    if (o == this)
        return true;

    if (!(o instanceof Set))
        return false;
    Collection c = (Collection) o;
    if (c.size() != size())
        return false;
        try {
            return containsAll(c);
        } catch (ClassCastException unused)   {
            return false;
        } catch (NullPointerException unused) {
            return false;
        }
    }

OTHER TIPS

Set already defines .equals(), and all implementations of Set are required to implement it the way the doc says (and, of course, it goes for .hashCode() as well).

So you just have to:

set1.equals(set2)

Note that the contract stipulate that order of elements does not matter, so [1, 2, 3] and [2, 1, 3] are equal. This is unlike List where order does matter.

Licensed under: CC-BY-SA with attribution
Not affiliated with StackOverflow
scroll top