What makes a pseudorandom generator, a high quality one?
-
04-11-2019 - |
Question
Reading this answer to this SO question: Why do we not combine random number generators?, it talks about
very high-quality PRNG (Pseudo Random Number Generator)
so it makes me wonder what constitutes a high-quality PRNG, I assume you can sum it up as it being "more random", but
Question1: Which qualities of a PRNG are used to describe how 'random' or 'good' it is?
Question2: If you have a 'bad quality' PRNG, is there a way to make it better quality?
No correct solution
Licensed under: CC-BY-SA with attribution
Not affiliated with cs.stackexchange