Question

  • ...Provider
  • ...Searcher
  • ...Resolver
  • ...Builder
  • ...Manager
  • ...Importer
  • ...Descriptor
  • ...Helper
  • ...Indexer

Is it a global convention to refer a thing with "..ers" or "..ors". In contrast, a "thing" that composes with behaviors (habits) or attributes (properties) doesn't go with such naming convention.

It is fun to think that we named the classes based on their behaviors. The "Manager" classes are always resembles my Project Manager.

No correct solution

Licensed under: CC-BY-SA with attribution
scroll top