Question

I'm not talking about tools that let one view a page in combinations of operating systems and browsers like crossbrowsertesting.com but in creating or figuring out the actual CSS.

Was it helpful?

Solution

If you guys are still coding for IE6, you're making a mistake.

I use IE7.js to get IE6 to render pages like IE7. IE7 is not perfect, but at least it has some semblance of standards. Since I only have to code for IE7 and FF it makes me 33% more efficient in terms of testing against browsers, something I think makes good business sense.

Link: IE7.js

OTHER TIPS

Use a css reset to level the field across browsers. YUI and Eric Meyer have good ones.

I write to the standards and both Firefox and IE7 follow a pretty good set in common.

IE6 is dead as far as I am concerned but if I get back into professional web dev I'll probably have to revise that ;)

I try to make a standards-compliant page and do all my testing in Firefox (since it has some excellent development extensions such as Web Developer and Firebug). Then when I'm finished I test the site in IE, then make whatever small changes are necessary. I find that I need to make very few changes, since I don't do anything extraordinarily complex with CSS.

I used to have more problems with Javascript differences, but after I started using Javascript libraries (such as jQuery) I stopped having any serious problems with that.

Padding.

IE6 can get a little hinky when using margin to place elements horizontally on a page. If you size your elements and space the content within using padding, you can make many layouts work great in IE6/7, FF, Safari, and Opera without any hacks. IE5.5 makes things a little stickier because of the broken box model, but I think we can pretty much count it out in most circumstances now.

I try to make a standards-compliant page and do all my testing in Firefox (since it has some excellent development extensions such as Web Developer and Firebug). Then when I'm finished I test the site in IE, then make whatever small changes are necessary. I find that I need to make very few changes, since I don't do anything extraordinarily complex with CSS.

The same here, except I don't tend to need to use Firebug and such. I've only had problems with IE6 recently however - which are solved by simple CSS bypasses:

/* All browsers read: */
html body {
    margin: 10px;
}

/* FF, IE7, Op etc. read: */
html > body {
    margin: 0;
}

I'm with Eli. Writing against firefox (with firebug installed) makes you have to write "more compatible" code to begin with and then its less of a job later down the line when you come to make it compatible with IE.

Use the site QuirksMode to help you find answers to compatbility information

If it's a brand new project I make it a point to test all html+css changes on all browsers I'm targeting as I make the changes. In the past I tended to focus on my favorite browser and then test with the others after I was done to find that one or more small quirks were present and it was very tedious to pin-point the actual cause. Now I have all browsers open and just go through refreshing each one after each html/css change to make sure the display meets my expectation. When something goes wrong, I know exactly what caused it.

It might seem time-consuming to test on all browsers at once, but in the long-run it actually saves time as you catch the problems at once.

Licensed under: CC-BY-SA with attribution
Not affiliated with StackOverflow
scroll top