Question
Is it possible to use EJB 3 with JDBC. I read somewhere, that it's allowed.
However, I hear that EJB 3 implementation uses JTA, by default. What does that mean for JDBC? Is it only for the transaction support? That means JTA is used for transaction when using JDBC code? Meaning that even local transactions are implemented as global transactions?
Does it mean it's not a good idea to use JDBC with EJB 3? Many people point me to JPA, but it's an ORM. I want to use SQL.
any suggestions?
Solution
1º
That means JTA is used for transaction when using JDBC code ?
And
Meaning that even local transactions are implemented as global transactions ?
The EJB container CAN MAKE USE of resource manager local transactions AS AN OPTIMIZATION TECHNIQUE for enterprise beans for which distributed transactions ARE NOT NEEDED.
It is a good idea do the following when using a declarative or programmatic transaction demarcation:
- declare resources using the Resource annotation in the enterprise bean class or using the resource-ref element in the enterprise bean’s deployment descriptor
Something like (setter method or member field)
// mappedName points to a global mapping name
@Resource(mappedName="java:/DefaultDS")
private javax.sql.DataSource ds;
And inside a business logic method
If you are using a declarative transaction
Connection conn = ds.getConnection();
If you are using a programmatic transaction
Declare a setter or member field UserTransaction
@Resource
private UserTransaction ut;
And
ut.beginTransaction();
Connection conn = ds.getConnection();
ut.commit();
Take care of the following
If you are using a Stateful session bean, do the following in the PrePassivate callback method
- Close all JDBC connections in the PrePassivate method and assign the instance’s fields storing the connections to null
regards,
OTHER TIPS
You can look at this page, it does appear that you can combine EJB3 with JDBC.
http://www.java2s.com/Tutorial/Java/0415__EJB3/UseJDBCInEJB.htm
If you are using JPA2, you can use entityManager.unwrap(Connection.class)
to get actual connection and use with your JDBC code.
For example:
Connection connection = entityManager.unwrap( Connection.class );
try (Statement stmt = connection.createStatement()) {
stmt.executeUpdate( "INSERT INTO MyTable( name ) VALUES ( 'my name' ) " );
}
Does it mean it's not a good idea to use JDBC with EJB 3? Many people point me to JPA, but it's an ORM. I want to use SQL.
Sometime it's necessary, for performance or compatibility issues. I usually use this technique to execute PL/PSQL with array parameters, complex Posgis SQL, etc.