Question

I have a member function which takes a constant reference parameter to another object. I want to const_cast this parameter in order to easily use it inside the member function. For this purpose, which of the following codes is better?:

void AClass::AMember(const BClass & _BObject)
{
    // FORM #1 - Cast as an object:
    BClass BObject = const_cast<BClass &>(_BObject);
    // ...
}

void AClass::AMember(const BClass & _BObject)
{
    // FORM #2 - Cast as a reference:
    BClass & BObject = const_cast<BClass &>(_BObject);
    // ...
}

Can you please compare these two forms? Which one is better in criteria of speed and memory usage?

Was it helpful?

Solution

The first version makes a copy of the object. The second version doesn't. So the second version will be faster unless you want to make a copy.

By the way, all identifiers that start with an underscore followed by a capital letter are reserved for use by the compiler. You should not be using variable names like _BObject.

OTHER TIPS

The first one doesn't make any sense as you cast away constness of _BObject to only later pass it as a constant reference to BClass constructor and create a copy, BObject. The second one does what it means - casts away the constness and keeps the reference to the original object. So if you ask me, the second one is better. Be aware though that const_cast is not always safe.

Licensed under: CC-BY-SA with attribution
Not affiliated with StackOverflow
scroll top