JSR: Specification for evaluation vs Specification for building an implementation

StackOverflow https://stackoverflow.com/questions/8271702

  •  09-03-2021
  •  | 
  •  

Question

Could anyone, please, explain what is the difference between the two: Specification for evaluation vs Specification for building an implementation for any available JSR process, for example, JSR 299.

Sometimes this valuable source of the information, but for me as a developer which one should I download and to read? What annoys a lot - is that sometimes these two are the same.

Any thoughts?

Was it helpful?

Solution

The difference is in the license that you accept before downloading the specification. I'm surprised you didn't notice this as you carefully studied each document! For the JSRs I've checked, the documents are identical—including the implementation license in-lined in the document.

The evaluation link offers a "Limited Evaluation License" for evaluating the specification. I think this is aimed at JCP participants, public commentators, and application developers that want to understand the specification.

The implementation link offers a license to implementers. They get a royalty-free license to distribute implementations under certain conditions. Paraphrasing loosely, these requirements include: that the implementation completely implements the specification, that the implementation doesn't modify the java package namespace beyond what the specification allows, and that the implementation passes the applicable TCK.

Licensed under: CC-BY-SA with attribution
Not affiliated with StackOverflow
scroll top