Question

I had an earlier question about integrating Mathematica with functions written in C++.

This is a follow-up question:

If the computation takes too long I'd like to be able to abort it using Evaluation > Abort Evaluation. Which of the technologies suggested in the answers make it possible to have an interruptible C-based extension function? How can "interruptibility" be implemented on the C side?

I need to make my function interruptible in a way which will corrupt neither it, nor the Mathematica kernel (i.e. it should be possible to call the function again from Mathematica after it has been interrupted)

Was it helpful?

Solution

For MathLink - based functions, you will have to do two things (On Windows): use MLAbort to check for aborts, and call MLCallYieldFunction, to yield the processor temporarily. Both are described in the MathLink tutorial by Todd Gayley from way back, available here.

Using the bits from my previous answer, here is an example code to compute the prime numbers (in an inefficient manner, but this is what we need here for an illustration):

code = 
"
#include <stdlib.h>

extern void primes(int n);

static void yield(){
    MLCallYieldFunction(
        MLYieldFunction(stdlink), 
        stdlink,
       (MLYieldParameters)0 );
}

static void abort(){
    MLPutFunction(stdlink,\" Abort \",0);
}

void primes(int n){
    int i = 0, j=0,prime = 1, *d = (int *)malloc(n*sizeof(int)),ctr = 0;    
    if(!d) {
       abort();
       return;
    }
    for(i=2;!MLAbort && i<=n;i++){
        j=2;
        prime = 1;      
        while (!MLAbort && j*j <=i){
            if(i % j == 0){
                prime = 0;
                break;
            }
            j++;
        }
        if(prime) d[ctr++] = i;
        yield();
    }
    if(MLAbort){
        abort();
        goto R1;
    }

    MLPutFunction(stdlink,\"List\",ctr);
    for(i=0; !MLAbort && i < ctr; i++ ){
        MLPutInteger(stdlink,d[i]);
        yield();        
    }
    if(MLAbort) abort();

 R1: free(d);
 }
 ";

and the template:

template = 
"
void primes P((int ));

:Begin:
:Function:       primes
:Pattern:        primes[n_Integer]
:Arguments:      { n }
:ArgumentTypes:  { Integer }
:ReturnType:     Manual
:End:
";

Here is the code to create the program (taken from the previous answer, slightly modified):

Needs["CCompilerDriver`"];
fullCCode = makeMLinkCodeF[code];
projectDir = "C:\\Temp\\MLProject1";
If[! FileExistsQ[projectDir], CreateDirectory[projectDir]]
pname = "primes";
files = MapThread[
   Export[FileNameJoin[{projectDir, pname <> #2}], #1, 
     "String"] &, {{fullCCode, template}, {".c", ".tm"}}];

Now, here we create it:

In[461]:= exe=CreateExecutable[files,pname];
Install[exe]

Out[462]= LinkObject["C:\Users\Archie\AppData\Roaming\Mathematica\SystemFiles\LibraryResources\
Windows-x86-64\primes.exe",161,10]

and use it:

In[464]:= primes[20]
Out[464]= {2,3,5,7,11,13,17,19}

In[465]:= primes[10000000]
Out[465]= $Aborted

In the latter case, I used Alt+"." to abort the computation. Note that this won't work correctly if you do not include a call to yield.

The general ideology is that you have to check for MLAbort and call MLCallYieldFunction for every expensive computation, such as large loops etc. Perhaps, doing that for inner loops like I did above is an overkill though. One thing you could try doing is to factor the boilerplate code away by using the C preprocessor (macros).

OTHER TIPS

Without ever having tried it, it looks like the Expression Packet functionality might work in this way - if your C code goes back and asks mathematica for some more work to do periodically, then hopefully aborting execution on the mathematica side will tell the C code that there is no more work to do.

If you are using LibraryLink to link external C code to the Mathematica kernel, you can use the Library callback function AbortQ to check if an abort is in progress.

Licensed under: CC-BY-SA with attribution
Not affiliated with StackOverflow
scroll top