dotNetRDF VS Jena.NEt VS others with Dotnet ?
-
21-04-2021 - |
Question
what is the most common tool used for Reading & Writing RDF and Querying with Sparql with different end points . so far i've found
- Jena (jena.net) : it's developed for Java but some people managed to convert it to Assemblies
- DotnetRDF
i wonder if there are others and which one is best to use what the the pros and cons ?
Solution 2
the best answer i've found in Answers.semantiweb
Give a try to dotNetRDF.
I have been used it in one of my projects and I am satisfied with it.
It is SPARQL-capable, supports both local and remote queries and, the most important, it is actively maintained
i've started using dotnetRDF the creator also have left a good documentation on the website http://www.dotnetrdf.org/
and a good tutorials as well
OTHER TIPS
Both of the above are good. Other ones include:
Sesame - Java covering RDF, SPARQL, OWL. Actively developed
Redland, Raptor Rasqal - C & Ruby, covers everything, actively developed
ARC2 - PHP, RDF, SPARQL, no longer activel developed
You've also got a lot of supporting frameworks for things like ORDFM that build off the above namely:
Empire
RDFBean
dotnetRdf Provides a suite of command line and GUI tools for working with RDF and SPARQL, you can find links to their documentation.Visit the link below... https://bitbucket.org/dotnetrdf/dotnetrdf/wiki/UserGuide/Tools
Maybe you can try RDFSharp at Microsoft Codeplex (http://rdfsharp.codeplex.com/).