Question

I have the following code:

template <class Ret>
class Foo
{
public:
    template <class T>
    void foo(T&, const std::function<Ret()>&)
    {
        std::cout << "std::function<Ret()>\n";
    }
    template <class T>
    void foo(T&, Ret(T::*)() const)
    {
        std::cout << "Ret(T::*)() const\n";
    }
    template <class T>
    void foo(T&, Ret(T::*)())
    {
        std::cout << " Ret(T::*)()\n";
    }
};

class A
{
public:
    void foo1() const
    {
    }
    void foo()
    {
    }
};

 int main()
 {

     A a;
     Foo<void> f;
     f.foo(a, &A::foo);
     f.foo(a, &A::foo1);
     f.foo(a, std::bind(&A::foo, a));
 }

It works well, but I don't want to have 2 different function for const and non-const member function pointer. So the question is: is there a way to merge void foo(T&, const std::function<Ret()>&) and void foo(T&, Ret(T::*)() const) to one function? Note, that there is std::function overload which should also participate in resolution after merge. I need some function which will take member function pointers only. And all other will make its way to std::function version.

Was it helpful?

Solution

You seem to be asking one implicit question and one explicit question. The answer to your implicit question, "how to merge the const and nonconst versions", is as follows

template<typename T, typename U, typename enable_if<is_fuction<T>::value, int>::type = 0> 
void takesboth(T U::*);
Licensed under: CC-BY-SA with attribution
Not affiliated with StackOverflow
scroll top