Question

I'm working on an application built with VC9 and I've hit upon a warning I don't fully understand: why is there an "unreachable code" warning on the closing brace of the constructor?

The minimal testcase to reproduce the issue is:

__declspec(noreturn) void foo() {
  // Do something, then terminate the program
}
struct A {
  A() {
    foo();
  } // d:\foo.cpp(7) : warning C4702: unreachable code
};
int main() {
  A a;
}

This must be compiled with /W4 to trigger the warning. Alternatively, you can compile with /we4702 to force an error on the detection of this warning.

d:\>cl /c /W4 foo.cpp
Microsoft (R) C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 15.00.21022.08 for x64
Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation.  All rights reserved.

foo.cpp
d:\foo.cpp(7) : warning C4702: unreachable code

Can someone explain what, precisely, is unreachable here? My best theory is that it's the destructor, but I'd like a definitive answer.

If I want to make this code warning-clean, how can I achieve that? The best I can come up with is convert this to a compile-time error.

struct A {
private:
  A(); // No, you can't construct this!
};
int main() {
  A a;
}

Edit: for clarification, terminating the program with a noreturn function doesn't normally cause an unreachable code warning on the closing brace enclosing that function call.

__declspec(noreturn) void foo() {
  // Do something, then terminate the program
}
struct A {
  A() {
  }
  ~A() {
    foo();
  }
};
int main() {
  A a;
}

Results in:

d:\>cl /c /W4 foo3.cpp
Microsoft (R) C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 15.00.21022.08 for x64
Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation.  All rights reserved.

foo3.cpp
Was it helpful?

Solution

Gorpik is on the right track. I've created two similar test cases, compiled them, and disassembled them and I think I've come to understand the underlying reason: the constructor always generates a return statement implicitly and this return statement is unreachable due to the noreturn function.

noreturn_constructor.cpp

__declspec(noreturn) void foo() {
  // Do something, then terminate the program
}
struct A {
  A() {
    foo();
  }
  ~A() {
  }
};
int main() {
  A a;
}

noreturn_destructor.cpp

__declspec(noreturn) void foo() {
  // Do something, then terminate the program
}
struct A {
  A() {
  }
  ~A() {
    foo();
  }
};
int main() {
  A a;
}

diff -u *.disasm

--- noreturn_constructor.disasm 2012-05-30 11:15:02.000000000 -0400
+++ noreturn_destructor.disasm  2012-05-30 11:15:08.000000000 -0400
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation.  All rights reserved.


-Dump of file noreturn_constructor.obj
+Dump of file noreturn_destructor.obj

 File Type: COFF OBJECT

@@ -35,15 +35,15 @@

 ??0A@@QEAA@XZ (public: __cdecl A::A(void)):
   0000000000000000: 48 89 4C 24 08     mov         qword ptr [rsp+8],rcx
-  0000000000000005: 48 83 EC 28        sub         rsp,28h
-  0000000000000009: E8 00 00 00 00     call        ?foo@@YAXXZ
-  000000000000000E: 48 8B 44 24 30     mov         rax,qword ptr [rsp+30h]
-  0000000000000013: 48 83 C4 28        add         rsp,28h
-  0000000000000017: C3                 ret
+  0000000000000005: 48 8B 44 24 08     mov         rax,qword ptr [rsp+8]
+  000000000000000A: C3                 ret

 ??1A@@QEAA@XZ (public: __cdecl A::~A(void)):
   0000000000000000: 48 89 4C 24 08     mov         qword ptr [rsp+8],rcx
-  0000000000000005: C3                 ret
+  0000000000000005: 48 83 EC 28        sub         rsp,28h
+  0000000000000009: E8 00 00 00 00     call        ?foo@@YAXXZ
+  000000000000000E: 48 83 C4 28        add         rsp,28h
+  0000000000000012: C3                 ret

   Summary

The unreachable code is this implicit return statement, which is generated in the constructor but not the destructor:

-  000000000000000E: 48 8B 44 24 30     mov         rax,qword ptr [rsp+30h]
+  0000000000000005: 48 8B 44 24 08     mov         rax,qword ptr [rsp+8]

OTHER TIPS

There are no destructors to be called at the end of A::A(), so that's not the problem. What cannot be reached is the actual construction of the object, which happens after the constructor has finished its execution. Since it can never finish, that compiler-generated code is unreachable.

The declspec(noreturn) on foo is producing this warning. You're telling the compiler that this function does not return. So the compiler is emitting a warning that your constructor will never complete.

see http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/k6ktzx3s(v=vs.80).aspx

"This __declspec attribute tells the compiler that a function does not return. As a consequence, the compiler knows that the code following a call to a __declspec(noreturn) function is unreachable."

The closing brace may generate code (like calling destructors), which will not be reached.

Licensed under: CC-BY-SA with attribution
Not affiliated with StackOverflow
scroll top