Best OS to deploy a low latency Java application?

Question

We have a low latency trading system (feed handlers, analytics, order entry) written in Java. It uses TCP and UDP extensively, it does not use Infiniband or other non-standard networking.

Can anyone comment on the tradeoffs of various OSes or OS configurations to deploy this system? While throughput is obviously important to keep up with modern price feeds, latency is our #1 priority.

Solaris seems like a natural candidate since they created Java; should I use Sparc or x64 processors?

I've heard good things about RHEL and SLERT, are those the right versions of Linux to use in our benchmarking.

Has anyone tested Windows against the above OSes? Or is it assumed to not keep up?

I'd like to leave the Java vs C++ debate for a different thread.

Answer 1

Vendors love this kind of benchmark. You have code, right?

IBM, Sun/Oracle, HP will all love to run your app on their gear to demonstrate their advantages.

Make them do this. If you have code, make the vendors run a demonstration on their gear to show which is best for your needs.

It's easy, painless, free, and factual. The final decision will be easy and obvious. And you will know how to install and tune to maximize performance.

---

What I hate doing is predicting this kind of thing before the code is written. Too many customers have asked for a H/W and OS recommendation before we've finished identifying all the use cases. Asking for that kind of precognition is simple craziness.

But you have code. You can produce test cases that exercise your code. That's perfect.

Answer 2

For a trading environment, in addition to low latency you are probably concerned about consistency as well as latency so focusing on reducing the impact of GC pauses as much as possible may well give you more benefit than differnt OS choices.

• The G1 garbage collector in recent versions of Suns Hotspot VM improves stop the world pauses a lot, in a similar way to the JRockit VM
• For real performance guarantees though, Azul Systems version of the Hotspot compiler on their Java Appliance delivers the lowest guaranteed pauses available - also it scales to a massive size - 100s of GB stack and 100s of cores.
• I'd discount Java Realtime - although you'd get guarantees of response, you'd sacrifice throughput to get those guarantees

However, if your planning on using your trading system in an environment where every microsecond counts, you're really going to have to live with the lack of consistency you will get from the current generation of VM's - none of them (except realtime) guarantees low microsecond GC pauses. Of course, at this level your going to run into the same issues from OS activity (process pre-emption, interrupt handling, page faults, etc.). In this case one of the real time variants of Linux is going to help you.

Answer 3

I wouldn't rule out Windows from this just because it's Windows. My expirience over the last few years has been that the Windows versions of the Sun JVM was usually the most mature performance wise in contrast to Linux or Soaris x86 on the same hardware. The JVM for Solaris SPARC may be good too, but I guess with Windows on x86 you'll get more power for less money.

Answer 4

I would strongly recommend that you look into an operating system you already have experience with. Solaris is a strange beast if you only know Linux, e.g.

Also I would strongly recommend to use a platform actually supported by Sun, as this will make it much easier to get professional assistance when you REALLY, REALLY need it.

http://java.sun.com/javase/6/webnotes/install/system-configurations.html

Answer 5

I'd probably worry about garbage collection causing latency well before the operating system; have you looked into tuning that at all?

If I were willing to spend the time to trial different OSs, I'd try Solaris 10 and NetBSD, and probably a Linux variant for good measure.

I'd experiment with 32-vs-64 bit architectures; 64 bit will give you a larger heap address space... but will take longer to address each bit of memory.

I'm assuming you've profiled your application and know where the bottlenecks are; by the comment about GC, you've done that. In that case, your application shouldn't be CPU-bound, and chip architecture shouldn't be a primary concern.

Answer 6

I don't think managed code environments and real-time processing go together very well. If you really care about latency, remove the layer imposed by the managed code. This is not a Java vs C++ argument, but a Java/C#/... vs C/C++/FORTRAN/... argument, and I believe that is a valid design discussion to have.

And yes, I do mean FORTRAN, we run a number of near real-time systems with a FORTRAN foundation.

Answer 7

One way to manage latency is to have several JVM's dividing the work with smaller heaps so that a stop the world garbage collection isn't as time consuming when it happens and affects less processes.

Another approach is to load up a cluster of JVM's with enough memory and allocate the processes to ensure there won't be a stop the world garbage collection during the hours you care about latency (if this isn't a 24/7 app), and restart JVMs on off hours.

You should also look at other JVM implementations as a possibility (such as JRocket). Of course if any of them are appropriate depends entirely on your specific application.

If any of the above matters to your approach, it will affect the choice of OS. For example, if you go with another JVM implementation, that might limit OS choices, and if you go with clustering or otherwise running a several JVM's for the application, that might require some better underlying OS tools to manage effectively, further influencing the OS choice.

Answer 8

The choice of operating system or configurable is completely redundant considering the availability of faster network fabrics.

Look at 10GigE with ToE NICs, or the faster solution of 4X QDR (40Gbs) InfiniBand but with IPoIB presenting a standard Ethernet interface and routing.