Possible obscure causes for Abstract Error in Delphi?

Question

In a Delphi 7 project we installed FastMM. Soon after that we noticed one of the forms started to issue Abstract Error message on close. I have debugged this extensively and I can't find the reason so far. The usual reason for this error message doesn't seem to apply here. The application doesn't define abstract classes. I also searched the form for a possible use of TStrings or something like that. Most importantly, we didn't (well, we think we didn't) make any changes to this form. It just broke.

1. Are there some other possible causes for this error besides trying to call unimplemented method?
2. Is there some possibilty that FastMM has enabled some obscure bug in the application, that remained hidden until now?

If the answer to these questions is no, then I'll just continue to search for an unimplemented method call, relieved that I am not missing something else.

Answer 1

If there is memory corruption then all sort of errors can be raised and it is very difficult to find the cause.

To answer your questions: 1) Yes abstract error can also be caused by memory corruption, and 2) Yes enabling FastMM can make bugs visible that normally pass unnoticed (but should still be fixed).

Some general advice for finding memory errors:

1. Try "FullDebugMode" setting in FastMM.
2. Make sure everything you Create is matched with a Free.
3. Make sure nothing is freed more than once.
4. Make sure an object is not used after it has been freed (or before it has been created).
5. Turn on hints and warnings (and fix them when they occur).

Answer 2

"It just broke" - it was probably always broke but now you know.

I have seen problems when closing a form as part of a button event. The form gets destroyed and then the remainder of the button messages get dispatched to a no-longer existing button. The Release method avoids this by (from memory) posting a wm_close message back to the form

Answer 3

Answer to question 1 "Are there some other possible causes for this error besides trying to call unimplemented method?"

Yes. This is what caused in my case an Abstract Error:

TWinControl(Sender).Visible:= FALSE;        

This worked when sender was a TButton but raised the error (of course) when the sender was something else (like TAction). It was obviously my fault. I should have used "as" instead of a hard typecast.

Answer to question 2: Yes. I have seen that happening too. We should be very clear that this doesn't mean that FastMM is buggy. The bug was 'dormant'. FastMM only triggered it.
Actually you should rely on FastMM even more to find your issue. Switch FastMM to full debug mode for this. It will help you with:

Make sure an object is not used after it has been freed (or before it has been created)

Also, in a few cases, the whole project was screwed up and I got the Abstract error. Nothing worked until I deleted the DPROJ file. Just do a compare between your current DPROJ file and the one in your back and you will see how the IDE f**** up the file.

You MUST also fix ALL warnings the compiler shows! The compiler is serious about that. It wouldn't raise an warning without a valid reason. Fix that and you will probably fix your problem.

In this particular case I would also replace all .Free with FreeAndNil().

Answer 4

You could try to add u_dzAbstractHandler to your project. It should raise the abstract error where the method was called, so it is easier to debug it. Of course this only helps when the error occurs when running in the debugger.

https://osdn.net/projects/dzlib-tools/scm/svn/blobs/head/dzlib/trunk/src/u_dzAbstractHandler.pas

Answer 5

Could be that one of your abstract functions/procedures in the base class is not implemented;

try this :

e.g

 type

   TBaseClass = class (TObject)

 public

      procedure DoSomething;  virtual; abstract; //not implemented procedure

 end;


  type

    TInheritedClass = class (TBaseClass)

 public

      procedure DoSomething; override;

   end;

//Implementation

procedure TInheritedClass.DoSomething;

begin

 //your code

end;