Question

I've been attempting a little SFINAE at making a way to determine if a generic type T has a copy constructor I can use. Here is where I currently am.

template <bool statement, typename out>
struct Failable
{
    typedef out Type;
};
//This class is only used to insert statements that 
//could encounter substitution failure


template <typename O>
struct COPY
{
    template <typename T>
    typename Failable<true == sizeof(&T::T(const T&)), char>::Type copy(int)
    {}

    template <typename T>
    typename Failable<true, int>::Type copy(...)
    {}

};

However, this is also where I'm kinda stuck. &T::T(const T&) is obviously an invalid statement, as we can't provide an argument list with a pointer-to-member, even if a p-t-m-function. I could always try to specify some sort of void (T::*ptmf)(const T&) = &T::T, and hope it implicitly determines the right overloaded constructor to put into the pointer to member function, but that also implies that Constructors have a specific return type, which I would have to specify.

Does anyone else have any ideas with which I can trek forth? (I also need to apply a similar concept to checking for an assignment operator.)

Thanks in advanced.

Was it helpful?

Solution

You could use std::is_copy_constructible and std::is_assignable for this.

OTHER TIPS

You can do with your code, just need to modify it a little bit.

template <bool statement, typename out>
struct Failable
{
     typedef out Type;
}; 

template <typename O>
struct COPY
{

     static O MakeO();

     template <typename U> // U and T are the same type
     static typename Failable<(sizeof U(MakeO())), char>::Type copy(int);

     template <typename U>
     static typename Failable<true, int>::Type copy(...);

     enum { value = sizeof(char) == sizeof( copy<O>(0) ) };
};
Licensed under: CC-BY-SA with attribution
Not affiliated with StackOverflow
scroll top