Question

After some find and replace refactoring I ended up with this gem:

const class A
{
};

What does "const class" mean? It seems to compile ok.

Was it helpful?

Solution

What does "const class" mean? It seems to compile ok.

Not for me it doesn't. I think your compiler's just being polite and ignoring it.

Edit: Yep, VC++ silently ignores the const, GCC complains.

OTHER TIPS

The const is meaningless in that example, and your compiler should give you an error, but if you use it to declare variables of that class between the closing } and the ;, then that defines those instances as const, e.g.:


const class A
{
public:
    int x, y;
}  anInstance = {3, 4};

// The above is equivalent to:
const A anInstance = {3, 4};

If you had this:

const class A
{
} a;

Then it would clearly mean that 'a' is const. Otherwise, I think that it is likely invalid c++.

It's meaningless unless you declare an instance of the class afterward, such as this example:

const // It is a const object...
class nullptr_t 
{
  public:
    template<class T>
      operator T*() const // convertible to any type of null non-member pointer...
    { return 0; }

    template<class C, class T>
    operator T C::*() const   // or any type of null member pointer...
    { return 0; }

  private:
    void operator&() const;  // Can't take address of nullptr

} nullptr = {};

An interim nullptr implementation if you're waiting for C++0x.

Try compiling it with GCC, it will give you below error:
error: qualifiers can only be specified for objects and functions.

As you can see from the error that only objects(variables, pointers, class objects etc.) and functions can be constant. So try making the object as constant, then it should compile fine.
const class A {};
const A a ;

Licensed under: CC-BY-SA with attribution
Not affiliated with StackOverflow
scroll top