Question

I'm a big fan of using the forEach method on nodeLists like this:

var nodes = document.querySelectorAll(".foo");

[].forEach.call(nodes, function (item) {
    //do stuff with item
});

I was wondering though, does doing it that way take longer than the regular way? e.g.

for(var i=0;i<nodes.length;i++){
    //do stuff with nodes[i];
}
Was it helpful?

Solution

Here's a nice performance comparison. According to it Array.forEach is slower than a native for loop.

OTHER TIPS

I know it's an old post but using the forEach method can be done by stealing the Array prototype as well.

NodeList.prototype.forEach = Array.prototype.forEach;

It depends on the browser. And don't forget about while() which is the fastest on Firefox 4. Here's a comparison.

Also keep in mind that if you're supporting older browsers that don't support forEach, you need to add in the time it takes to implement a polyfill.

Licensed under: CC-BY-SA with attribution
Not affiliated with StackOverflow
scroll top