Question

Given the following class structure:

@MappedSuperclass
@Inheritance(strategy=InheritanceType.TABLE_PER_CLASS)
public abstract class Animal  {}

@Entity
public class Dog {}

@Entity
public class Cat {}

With Spring Data JPA, is it possible to use a generic Animal Repository to persist an Animal at runtime without knowing which kind of Animal it is?

I know I can do it using a Repository-per-entity and by using instanceof like this:

if (thisAnimal instanceof Dog) 
    dogRepository.save(thisAnimal);
else if (thisAnimal instanceof Cat)
    catRepository.save(thisAnimal);
} 

but I don't want to resort to the bad practice of using instanceof.

I've tried using a generic Repository like this:

public interface AnimalRepository extends JpaRepository<Animal, Long> {}

But this results in this Exception: Not an managed type: class Animal. I'm guessing because Animal is not an Entity, it's a MappedSuperclass.

What's the best solution?

BTW - Animal is listed with the rest off my classes in persistence.xml, so that's not the problem.

Was it helpful?

Solution

Actually the problem is with your mapping. You either use @MappedSuperclass or @Inheritance. Both together don't make sense. Change your entity to:

@Entity
@Inheritance(strategy=InheritanceType.TABLE_PER_CLASS)
public abstract class Animal  {}

Don't worry, the underlying database scheme is the same. Now one, general AnimalRepository will work. Hibernate will do the introspection and find out which table to use for an actual subtype.

Licensed under: CC-BY-SA with attribution
Not affiliated with StackOverflow
scroll top