Question

I need to find whether a number is divisible by 3 without using %, / or *. The hint given was to use atoi() function. Any idea how to do it?

Was it helpful?

Solution

Subtract 3 until you either

a) hit 0 - number was divisible by 3

b) get a number less than 0 - number wasn't divisible

-- edited version to fix noted problems

while n > 0:
    n -= 3
while n < 0:
    n += 3
return n == 0

OTHER TIPS

The current answers all focus on decimal digits, when applying the "add all digits and see if that divides by 3". That trick actually works in hex as well; e.g. 0x12 can be divided by 3 because 0x1 + 0x2 = 0x3. And "converting" to hex is a lot easier than converting to decimal.

Pseudo-code:

int reduce(int i) {
  if (i > 0x10)
    return reduce((i >> 4) + (i & 0x0F)); // Reduces 0x102 to 0x12 to 0x3.
  else
   return i; // Done.
}
bool isDiv3(int i) {
  i = reduce(i);
  return i==0 || i==3 || i==6 || i==9 || i==0xC || i == 0xF;
}

[edit] Inspired by R, a faster version (O log log N):

int reduce(unsigned i) {
  if (i >= 6)
    return reduce((i >> 2) + (i & 0x03));
  else
   return i; // Done.
}
bool isDiv3(unsigned  i) {
  // Do a few big shifts first before recursing.
  i = (i >> 16) + (i & 0xFFFF);
  i = (i >> 8) + (i & 0xFF);
  i = (i >> 4) + (i & 0xF);
  // Because of additive overflow, it's possible that i > 0x10 here. No big deal.
  i = reduce(i);
  return i==0 || i==3;
}

Split the number into digits. Add the digits together. Repeat until you have only one digit left. If that digit is 3, 6, or 9, the number is divisible by 3. (And don't forget to handle 0 as a special case).

While the technique of converting to a string and then adding the decimal digits together is elegant, it either requires division or is inefficient in the conversion-to-a-string step. Is there a way to apply the idea directly to a binary number, without first converting to a string of decimal digits?

It turns out, there is:

Given a binary number, the sum of its odd bits minus the sum of its even bits is divisible by 3 iff the original number was divisible by 3.

As an example: take the number 3726, which is divisible by 3. In binary, this is 111010001110. So we take the odd digits, starting from the right and moving left, which are [1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1]; the sum of these is 5. The even bits are [0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1]; the sum of these is 2. 5 - 2 = 3, from which we can conclude that the original number is divisible by 3.

A number divisible by 3, iirc has a characteristic that the sum of its digit is divisible by 3. For example,

12 -> 1 + 2 = 3
144 -> 1 + 4 + 4 = 9

The interview question essentially asks you to come up with (or have already known) the divisibility rule shorthand with 3 as the divisor.

One of the divisibility rule for 3 is as follows:

Take any number and add together each digit in the number. Then take that sum and determine if it is divisible by 3 (repeating the same procedure as necessary). If the final number is divisible by 3, then the original number is divisible by 3.

Example:

16,499,205,854,376
=> 1+6+4+9+9+2+0+5+8+5+4+3+7+6 sums to 69
=> 6 + 9 = 15 => 1 + 5 = 6, which is clearly divisible by 3.

See also

Given a number x. Convert x to a string. Parse the string character by character. Convert each parsed character to a number (using atoi()) and add up all these numbers into a new number y. Repeat the process until your final resultant number is one digit long. If that one digit is either 3,6 or 9, the origional number x is divisible by 3.

My solution in Java only works for 32-bit unsigned ints.

static boolean isDivisibleBy3(int n) {
  int x = n;
  x = (x >>> 16) + (x & 0xffff); // max 0x0001fffe
  x = (x >>> 8) + (x & 0x00ff); // max 0x02fd
  x = (x >>> 4) + (x & 0x000f); // max 0x003d (for 0x02ef)
  x = (x >>> 4) + (x & 0x000f); // max 0x0011 (for 0x002f)
  return ((011111111111 >> x) & 1) != 0;
}

It first reduces the number down to a number less than 32. The last step checks for divisibility by shifting the mask the appropriate number of times to the right.

You didn't tag this C, but since you mentioned atoi, I'm going to give a C solution:

int isdiv3(int x)
{
    div_t d = div(x, 3);
    return !d.rem;
}
bool isDiv3(unsigned int n)
{
    unsigned int n_div_3 =
        n * (unsigned int) 0xaaaaaaab;
    return (n_div_3 < 0x55555556);//<=>n_div_3 <= 0x55555555

/*
because 3 * 0xaaaaaaab == 0x200000001 and
 (uint32_t) 0x200000001 == 1
*/
}

bool isDiv5(unsigned int n)
{
    unsigned int n_div_5 =
        i * (unsigned int) 0xcccccccd;
    return (n_div_5 < 0x33333334);//<=>n_div_5 <= 0x33333333

/*
because 5 * 0xcccccccd == 0x4 0000 0001 and
 (uint32_t) 0x400000001 == 1
*/
}

Following the same rule, to obtain the result of divisibility test by 'n', we can : multiply the number by 0x1 0000 0000 - (1/n)*0xFFFFFFFF compare to (1/n) * 0xFFFFFFFF

The counterpart is that for some values, the test won't be able to return a correct result for all the 32bit numbers you want to test, for example, with divisibility by 7 :

we got 0x100000000- (1/n)*0xFFFFFFFF = 0xDB6DB6DC and 7 * 0xDB6DB6DC = 0x6 0000 0004, We will only test one quarter of the values, but we can certainly avoid that with substractions.

Other examples :

11 * 0xE8BA2E8C = A0000 0004, one quarter of the values

17 * 0xF0F0F0F1 = 10 0000 0000 1 comparing to 0xF0F0F0F Every values !

Etc., we can even test every numbers by combining natural numbers between them.

A number is divisible by 3 if all the digits in the number when added gives a result 3, 6 or 9. For example 3693 is divisible by 3 as 3+6+9+3 = 21 and 2+1=3 and 3 is divisible by 3.

inline bool divisible3(uint32_t x)  //inline is not a must, because latest compilers always optimize it as inline.
{
    //1431655765 = (2^32 - 1) / 3
    //2863311531 = (2^32) - 1431655765
    return x * 2863311531u <= 1431655765u;
}

On some compilers this is even faster then regular way: x % 3. Read more here.

well a number is divisible by 3 if all the sum of digits of the number are divisible by 3. so you could get each digit as a substring of the input number and then add them up. you then would repeat this process until there is only a single digit result.

if this is 3, 6 or 9 the number is divisable by 3.

A number is divisible by 3 iff the sum of its digits is divisible by 3. You can use this definition recursively until you are left with a single digit. If the result is 3, 6 or 9, the original number is divisible by 3 otherwise it's not.

Exaple: 33333 => 15 (3+3+3+3+3) => 6 (1+5) so 33333 is divisible by 3.

See Divisibility rules

C# Solution for checking if a number is divisible by 3

namespace ConsoleApplication1
{
    class Program
    {
        static void Main(string[] args)
        {
            int num = 33;
            bool flag = false;

            while (true)
            {
                num = num - 7;
                if (num == 0)
                {
                    flag = true;
                    break;
                }
                else if (num < 0)
                {
                    break;
                }
                else
                {
                    flag = false;
                }
            }

            if (flag)
                Console.WriteLine("Divisible by 3");
            else
                Console.WriteLine("Not Divisible by 3");

            Console.ReadLine();

        }
    }
}
  • Here is a pseudo-algol i came up with .

Let us follow binary progress of multiples of 3

000 011
000 110

001 001
001 100
001 111

010 010
010 101


011 000
011 011
011 110

100 001
100 100
100 111

101 010
101 101

just have a remark that, for a binary multiple of 3 x=abcdef in following couples abc=(000,011),(001,100),(010,101) cde doest change , hence, my proposed algorithm:

divisible(x):

    y = x&7

    z = x>>3

    if number_of_bits(z)<4

        if z=000 or 011 or 110 , return (y==000 or 011 or 110) end

        if z=001 or 100 or 111 , return (y==001 or 100 or 111) end

        if z=010 or 101 , return (y==010 or 101) end

    end

    if divisible(z) , return (y==000 or 011 or 110) end

    if divisible(z-1) , return (y==001 or 100 or 111) end

    if divisible(z-2) , return (y==010 or 101) end

end

Here is your optimized solution that every one should know.................

Source: http://www.geeksforgeeks.org/archives/511

#include<stdio.h>


int isMultiple(int n)
{
    int o_count = 0;
    int e_count = 0;


    if(n < 0)  
           n = -n;
    if(n == 0) 
           return 1;
    if(n == 1)
           return 0;

    while(n)
    {

        if(n & 1)
           o_count++;
        n = n>>1;


        if(n & 1)
            e_count++;
        n = n>>1;
    }

     return isMultiple(abs(o_count - e_count));
}


int main()
{
    int num = 23;
    if (isMultiple(num))
        printf("multiple of 3");
    else
        printf(" not multiple of 3");

    return 0;
}
Licensed under: CC-BY-SA with attribution
Not affiliated with StackOverflow
scroll top