You're thinking of garbage collection backwards. Broadly speaking, things are marked as garbage when you can't trace from a root to them. Having a local reference to the global object does not mean the global object has a reference to you, so it doesn't affect the lifetime of anything.
How does a global "window" reference affect garbage collection in an iife?
-
24-03-2022 - |
Question
function BigObject() {
var a = '';
for (var i = 0; i <= 0xFFFF; i++) a += String.fromCharCode(i);
return new String(a); // Turn this into an actual object
}
// iife 1 / window gets compressed into w
(function (w, $) {
var x = new BigObject();
$("#foo").click(function () {
w._gaq.push("foo");
});
})(window, window.jQuery);
// iife 2 / window reference left global
(function ($) {
var x = new BigObject();
$("#foo").click(function () {
window._gaq.push("foo");
});
})(window.jQuery);
Given my minimal understanding of garbage-collection and how items are held in memory, it seems like 1
might cause some memory issues when compared with 2
. More of an academic question at this point than an actual bottleneck... Ball help?
Solution
OTHER TIPS
If you were to do this the other way:
(function (w) {
var name = "bob",
obj1 = { a : 1, b : 2 },
obj = (function () {
var a = obj1,
return { items : a, getName : function () { return name; } };
}());
w.thing = obj;
}(window));
Now you're running into garbage-hindrances. Window has a reference to obj. Obj has a reference to obj1, and has a function with a reference to name...
...so none of the stuff inside of either of these closure is garbage-collectable, until the program has absolutely no references left of window.thing
.
Licensed under: CC-BY-SA with attribution
Not affiliated with StackOverflow