Question

I am following a tutorial to setup a service to start on boot where the last piece of the code is:

Make an entry of this service in AndroidManifest.xml as

<service android:name="MyService">
<intent-filter>
<action
android:name="com.wissen.startatboot.MyService" />
</intent-filter>
</service>

Now start this service in the BroadcastReceiver MyStartupIntentReceiver’s onReceive method as

public void onReceive(Context context, Intent intent) {
    Intent serviceIntent = new Intent();
    serviceIntent.setAction("com.wissen.startatboot.MyService");
    context.startService(serviceIntent);

}

As you see it uses intent-filters and when starts the service adds action. Can I just use

startService(new Intent(this, MyService.class));

What's the advantage of one compared to the other?

Was it helpful?

Solution

Assuming this is all in one application, you can use the latter form (MyService.class).

What's the advantage of one compared to the other?

I'd use the custom action string if you wanted third parties to start this service.

OTHER TIPS

As I have already mentioned in the comment, actions may be useful self-testing. E.g., a service performs a lot of tasks. For every task there is an action. If the service is started with an unknown action, an IllegalArgumentException will be thrown.

I usually use this approach in onStartCommand.

String action = intent.getAction();
if (action.equals(ACT_1)) { 
    // Do task #1
} else if (action.equals(ACT_2)) {
    // Do task #2
} else { 
    throw IllegalArgumentException("Illegal action " + action);
}
Licensed under: CC-BY-SA with attribution
Not affiliated with StackOverflow
scroll top