Question

I think it might be only performance case - http://jsperf.com/comparing-underscore-js-isfunction-with-typeof-function/2

And seems that typeof is faster.. so my question is - which is more appropriate to use?

Was it helpful?

Solution

There is no reason not to use typeof.

Not only is it faster but the ECMAScript specification ensures that all functions have a type of "function" and that only functions can have a type of "function" :

enter image description here

This operator was specifically designed to get the type of a value, so why not use it ?

OTHER TIPS

Firstly, Underscore doesn't use that implementation anymore. It optimizes to typeof unless typeof /./ returns function, as it did atleast in older versions of Chrome

You can find this in the source code: http://underscorejs.org/underscore.js

// Optimize `isFunction` if appropriate.
  if (typeof (/./) !== 'function') {
    _.isFunction = function(obj) {
      return typeof obj === 'function';
    };
  }

New jsperf: http://jsperf.com/comparing-underscore-js-isfunction-with-typeof-function/3

It still shows quite a performance hit in FF (but MUCH less than the naive implementation you posted in the question), which is due to the overhead of a function call vs just inlining code.

Licensed under: CC-BY-SA with attribution
Not affiliated with StackOverflow
scroll top