Question

I've been trying to find a standards-compliant way to check for Infinite and NaN values in Fortran 90/95 but it proved harder than I thought.

  • I tried to manually create Inf and NaN variables using the binary representation described in IEEE 754, but I found no such functionality.
  • I am aware of the intrinsic ieee_arithmetic module in Fortran 2003 with the ieee_is_nan() and ieee_is_finite() intrinsic functions. However it's not supported by all the compilers (notably gfortran as of version 4.9).

Defining infinity and NaN at the beginning like pinf = 1. / 0 and nan = 0. / 0 seems hackish to me and IMHO can raise some building problems - for example if some compilers check this in compile time one would have to provide a special flag.

Is there a way I can implement in standard Fortran 90/95?

function isinf(x)
! Returns .true. if x is infinity, .false. otherwise
...
end function isinf

and isnan()?

Was it helpful?

Solution

The simple way without using the ieee_arithmatic is to do the following.

Infinity: Define your variable infinity = HUGE(dbl_prec_var) (or, if you have it, a quad precision variable). Then you can simply check to see if your variable is infinity by if(my_var > infinity).

NAN: This is even easier. By definition, NAN is not equal to anything, even itself. Simply compare the variable to itself: if(my_var /= my_var).

OTHER TIPS

I don't have enough rep to comment so I'll "answer" regarding Rick Thompson's suggestion for testing infinity.

if (A-1 .eq. A) 

This will also be true if A is a very large floating point number, and 1 is below the precision of A.

A simple test:

subroutine test_inf_1(A)
    real, intent(in) :: A
    print*, "Test (A-1 == A)"
    if (A-1 .eq. A) then
        print*, "    INFINITY!!!"
    else
        print*, "    NOT infinite"
    endif
end subroutine

subroutine test_inf_2(A)
    real, intent(in) :: A
    print*, "Test (A > HUGE(A))"
    if (A > HUGE(A)) then
        print*, "    INFINITY!!!"
    else
        print*, "    NOT infinite"
    endif
end subroutine


program test
    real :: A,B

    A=10
    print*, "A = ",A
    call test_inf_1(A)
    call test_inf_2(A)
    print*, ""

    A=1e20
    print*, "A = ",A
    call test_inf_1(A)
    call test_inf_2(A)
    print*, ""

    B=0.0 ! B is necessary to trick gfortran into compiling this
    A=1/B
    print*, "A = ",A
    call test_inf_1(A)
    call test_inf_2(A)
    print*, ""

end program test

outputs:

A =    10.0000000    
Test (A-1 == A)
    NOT infinite
Test (A > HUGE(A))
    NOT infinite

A =    1.00000002E+20
Test (A-1 == A)
    INFINITY!!!
Test (A > HUGE(A))
    NOT infinite

A =          Infinity
Test (A-1 == A)
    INFINITY!!!
Test (A > HUGE(A))
    INFINITY!!!

No.

The salient parts of IEEE_ARITHMETIC for generating/checking for NaN's are easy enough to write for gfortran for a particular architecture.

I have used:

  PROGRAM MYTEST
  USE, INTRINSIC :: IEEE_ARITHMETIC, ONLY: IEEE_IS_FINITE      
  DOUBLE PRECISION :: number, test
  number = 'the expression to test'
  test = number/number
  IF (IEEE_IS_FINITE(test)) THEN
     WRITE(*,*) 'We are OK'
  ELSE
     WRITE(*,*) 'Got a problem'
  END IF         
     WRITE(*,*) number, test
  END PROGRAM MYTEST

This will print 'Got a problem' for number = 0.0D0, 1.0D0/0.0D0, 0.0D0/0.0D0, SQRT(-2.0D0), and also for overflows and underflows such as number = EXP(1.0D800) or number = EXP(-1.0D800). Notice that generally, things like number = EXP(1.0D-800) will just set number = 1.0 and produce a warning at compilation time, but the program will print 'We are OK', which I find acceptable.

OL.

for testing NaN none of the things worked eg.if testing real s2p to see if it is NaN then

if(isnan(s2p)) 

did not work in gfortran nor did

if(s2p.ne.s2p). 

The only thing that worked was

if(.not.s2p<1.and..not.s2p>1)  

though to make real sure u may want to add

if(.not.s2p<1.and..not.s2p>1.and..not.s2p==1)    

No.

Neither is there a standards-compliant way of checking for infinities or NaNs in Fortran 90/95, nor can there be a standards-compliant way. There is no standards-compliant way of defining either of these quasi-numbers in Fortran 90/95.

For Fortran, 1/infinity=0 thus, divide your variable by zero i.e

program test
implicit none
real :: res
integer :: i

do i=1,1000000
    res=-log((1.+(10**(-real(i))))-1.)
    print*,i,res
    if ((1./res)==0.) then
        exit
    end if
end do

end program

there's your infinity check. No complication necessary.

For Inf it seems to work that if (A-1 .eq. A) is true, then A is Inf

Licensed under: CC-BY-SA with attribution
Not affiliated with StackOverflow
scroll top