I think the first four you derived are all in 5NF.
- {G CD}
- {EG}
But these two don't look right.
For one thing, one of your FDs is G->E. In a relation that contains only G and E, how did you determine that the right decomposition is
- {EG}
instead of
- {G E}
given that the FD G->E still has to hold?
At a glance, I don't see how you can derive G->CD from the FDs you gave.