I would not be concerned about the differences in the compressed files - depending on the container format and the checksum type used in the .xz
file, the compressed data could vary without affecting the contents.
EDIT I've been looking into this further, and wrote this script to test the PyLZMA Python2.x module and the lzma Python3.x built in module
from __future__ import print_function
try:
import lzma as xz
except ImportError:
import pylzma as xz
import os
# compress with xz command line util
os.system('xz -zkf test.txt')
# now compress with lib
with open('test.txt', 'rb') as f, open('test.txt.xzpy', 'wb') as out:
out.write(xz.compress(bytes(f.read())))
# compare the two files
from hashlib import md5
with open('test.txt.xz', 'rb') as f1, open('test.txt.xzpy', 'rb') as f2:
hash1 = md5(f1.read()).hexdigest()
hash2 = md5(f2.read()).hexdigest()
print(hash1, hash2)
assert hash1 == hash2
This compresses a file test.txt
with the xz
command line utility and with the Python module and compares the results. Under Python3 lzma produces the same result as xz
, however under Python2 PyLZMA produces a different result that cannot be extracted using the xz command line util.
What module are you using that is called "lzma" in Python2 and what command did you use to compress the data?
EDIT 2 Okay, I found the pyliblzma module for Python2. However it seems to use CRC32 as the default checksum algorithm (others use CRC64) and there is a bug that prevents changing the checksum algorithm https://bugs.launchpad.net/pyliblzma/+bug/1243344
You could possibly try compressing using xz -C crc32
to compare the results, but I'm still not having success making a valid compressed file using the Python2 libraries.