Domanda

Given a template alias

template<unsigned U>
using uint_ = integral_constant<unsigned,U>;

The partial specialization of

template<class T,class P>
struct size{};

as

template <class T,unsigned U>
struct size<T,uint_<U>>{};

generates a warning astemplate parameter can not be deduced for clang 3.1 while no warning is generated with gcc 4.7

So, is it malformed code?

È stato utile?

Soluzione

The code is perfectly fine in C++11. The Clang's warning can be ignored.

Altri suggerimenti

Another guy said that this is a Clang bug. You can work it around if you change the using declaration like this

template<unsigned T, unsigned U = T>
using uint_ = integral_constant<unsigned,U>;

As an educated guess, apparently Clang does not correctly update the identity of the template parameter that appears in the type-id. So it thinks in your example that the resulting type uint_<U> refers to the first parameter of the partial specialization (because within uint_ that is the case, but not in the point of use). Alternatively you can exchange the order at the point of use

template <unsigned U,class T>
struct size<T,uint_<U>>{};
Autorizzato sotto: CC-BY-SA insieme a attribuzione
Non affiliato a StackOverflow
scroll top