This is your query (somewhat formatted):
SELECT u.username, a.user_id, a.id,a.text,a.lang as fromLang, b.lang as toLang,
GROUP_CONCAT(DISTINCT b.id) AS translation_ids
FROM sentence a INNER JOIN
sentence_relationship sr
ON sr.sentence_id = a.id INNER JOIN
sentence b
ON b.id = sr.translation_id AND a.id = sr.sentence_id INNER JOIN
users as u
ON u.id = a.user_id
GROUP BY a.id
LIMIT 10;
It is unclear from your question whether the group_concat()
was added with the group by
. That could slow things down.
The limit 10
is taking the first 10 a.id
s that match (the group by
does an implicit ordering). If you do this with a subquery, it will probably speed up the query:
SELECT u.username, a.user_id, a.id,a.text,a.lang as fromLang, b.lang as toLang,
GROUP_CONCAT(DISTINCT b.id) AS translation_ids
FROM (select s.*
from sentence s
order by a.id
limit 10
) a INNER JOIN
sentence_relationship sr
ON sr.sentence_id = a.id INNER JOIN
sentence b
ON b.id = sr.translation_id AND a.id = sr.sentence_id INNER JOIN
users as u
ON u.id = a.user_id
GROUP BY a.id;
This assumes that all the joins do work and match records. If the joins are used for filtering, then you may get fewer than 10 rows back.